Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Take it as read : origins of trust in knowledge gained from print

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Einav, Shiri, Robinson, Elizabeth J. and Fox, Amy (2013) Take it as read : origins of trust in knowledge gained from print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol.114 (No.2). pp. 262-274. ISSN 0022-0965 (In Press)

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.016

Abstract

The ability to read opens up the possibility of learning about the world indirectly via print sources, providing a powerful new opportunity for children who have for years learned effectively from what people tell them. We compared children's trust in printed versus oral information. We also examined whether children who showed preferential trust in an informant with print assumed that the informant was still reliable about new information offered without print support. Children (N = 89 aged 3-6 years) received conflicting suggestions from two dolls about which picture showed an unfamiliar target. Only one doll's suggestion referred to a printed label read aloud. Prereaders, despite their exposure to print and presumed experience of others treating print sources as authoritative, showed no clear evidence of preferential trust in the suggestions with print support. Early readers, in contrast, consistently preferred the suggestions with print support. Importantly, despite having treated the doll with print as having a history of accuracy, early readers no longer showed trust in that doll when it subsequently had no print support. Children at the very earliest stages of reading treated the doll with print appropriately as having gained only specific information from the print sources. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Submitted Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0022-0965
Date: 2013
Volume: Vol.114
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 262-274
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.016
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/52092

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us