The Library
Options for early breast cancer follow-up in primary and secondary care : a systematic review
Tools
Taggart, Frances M., Donnelly, Peter K. and Dunn, Janet A.. (2012) Options for early breast cancer follow-up in primary and secondary care : a systematic review. BMC Cancer, Vol.12 (No.1). p. 238. ISSN 1471-2407
|
Text
WRAP_Taggart_1471-2407-12-238.pdf - Published Version Download (418Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-238
Abstract
Background Both incidence of breast cancer and survival have increased in recent years and there is a need to review follow up strategies. This study aims to assess the evidence for benefits of follow-up in different settings for women who have had treatment for early breast cancer. Method A systematic review to identify key criteria for follow up and then address research questions. Key criteria were: 1) Risk of second breast cancer over time - incidence compared to general population. 2) Incidence and method of detection of local recurrence and second ipsi and contra-lateral breast cancer. 3) Level 1–4 evidence of the benefits of hospital or alternative setting follow-up for survival and well-being. Data sources to identify criteria were MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, ZETOC, Health Management Information Consortium, Science Direct. For the systematic review to address research questions searches were performed using MEDLINE (2011). Studies included were population studies using cancer registry data for incidence of new cancers, cohort studies with long term follow up for recurrence and detection of new primaries and RCTs not restricted to special populations for trials of alternative follow up and lifestyle interventions. Results Women who have had breast cancer have an increased risk of a second primary breast cancer for at least 20 years compared to the general population. Mammographically detected local recurrences or those detected by women themselves gave better survival than those detected by clinical examination. Follow up in alternative settings to the specialist clinic is acceptable to women but trials are underpowered for survival. Conclusions Long term support, surveillance mammography and fast access to medical treatment at point of need may be better than hospital based surveillance limited to five years but further large, randomised controlled trials are needed.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Breast -- Cancer -- Early detection, Women's health services |
| Journal or Publication Title: | BMC Cancer |
| Publisher: | BioMed Central Ltd. |
| ISSN: | 1471-2407 |
| Date: | 13 June 2012 |
| Volume: | Vol.12 |
| Number: | No.1 |
| Page Range: | p. 238 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-238 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| Funder: | National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR) |
| References: | 1. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz J-M, De Angelis R, et al: Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 2008, 9:730–756. 2. Peto R, Boreham J, Clarke M, Davies C, Beral V: UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 years. Lancet 2000, 355:1822–1822. 3. Cancer_Research_UK: Breast cancer survival statistics., http:// infocancerresearchukorg/cancerstats/types/breast/survival/. 4. Ganz: Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96:376–387. 5. Ganz: Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002, 94:39–49. 6. Ganz PA, Hahn EE: Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:759–767. 7. Donnelly JMP, Donaldson LA: Follow-up of breast cancer: time for a new approach? Int J Clin Pract 2001, 55:431–433. 8. Donnelly PK, Hiller L, Dunn JA: National randomised controlled trial is needed. BMJ 2008, 336:461-b–462. 9. Dixon JM, Montgomery D: Follow-up after breast cancer. BMJ 2008, 336:107–108. 10. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Cooke TG: Follow-up in breast cancer: does routine clinical examination improve outcome? A systematic review of the literature. Br J Cancer 2007, 97:1632–1641. 11. Chen Y, Semenciw R, Kliewer E, Shi Y, Mao Y: Incidence of second primary breast cancer among women with a first primary in Manitoba, Canada. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001, 67:35–40. 12. Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B: Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: A population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 56:1038–1045. 13. Soerjomataram I, Louwman WJ, van der Sangen MJC, Roumen RMH, Coebergh JWW: Increased risk of second malignancies after in situ breast carcinoma in a population-based registry. Br J Cancer 2006, 95:393–397. 14. Chen Y, Thompson W, Semenciw R, Mao Y: Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999, 8:855–861. 15. Grunfeld E, Noorani H, McGahan L, Paszat L, Coyle D, et al: Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast 2002, 11:228–235. 16. Lu W, Jansen L, Post W, Bonnema J, Van de Velde J, et al: Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008, 114:413–412. 17. Grogan M, Rangan A, Gebski V, Boyages J: The value of follow-up of patients with early breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Breast 2002, 11:163–169. 18. Churn M, Kelly V: Outpatient follow-up after treatment for early breast cancer: updated results after 5 years. Clin Oncol 2001, 13:187–194. 19. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Jack WJ, Kerr GR, Kunkler IH, et al: Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience. [see comment]. Br J Cancer 2007, 96:1802–1807. 20. Kontos M, Roy P, Rizos D, Hamed H: An evidence based strategy for follow up after breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2011, 1:5. 21. Gujral DM, Sumo G, Owen JR, Ashton A, Bliss JM, et al: Ipsilateral breast tumor relapse: local recurrence versus new primary tumor and the effect of whole-breast radiotherapy on the rate of new primaries. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 79:19–25. 22. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Martinelli F, Bonardi R, Duffy SW: Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 2009, 20(9):1505–1510. 23. van der Sangen MJC, van de Poll-Franse LV, Roumen RMH, Rutten HJT, Coebergh JWW, et al: The prognosis of patients with local recurrence more than five years after breast conservation therapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006, 32:34–38. 24. Yau TK, Sze H, Soong IS, Wong W, Chan K, et al: Surveillance mammography after breast conservation therapy in Hong Kong: effectiveness and feasibility of risk-adapted approach. Breast 2008, 17:132–137. 25. Lash TL, Fox MP, Silliman RA: Reduced mortality rate associated with annual mammograms after breast cancer therapy. Breast J 2006, 12:2–6. 26. David A, Montgomery KKTGC: Locoregional relapse after breast cancer: most relapses occur late and are not clinically detected. Breast J 2009, 15:163–167. 27. Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, et al: Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:427–437. 28. National-Institute-for-Health-and-Clinical-Excellence: Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer - Diagnosis and Treatment.; 2009. www.niceorguk/ CG80. 29. Donnelly P, Hiller L, Bathers S, Bowden S, Coleman R: Questioning specialists' attitudes to breast cancer follow-up in primary care. Ann Oncol 2007, 18:1467–1476. 30. Khatcheressian J, Swainey C: Breast cancer follow-up in the adjuvant setting. Curr Oncol Rep 2008, 10:38–46. 31. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:5091–5097. 32. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Cole D, et al: Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ 1996, 313:665–669. 33. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, et al: Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:848–855. 34. Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, et al: Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ 2009, 338:a3147. 35. Koinberg I, Engholm GB, Genell A, Holmberg L: A health economic evaluation of follow-up after breast cancer surgery: results of an rct study. Acta Oncol 2009, 48:99–104. 36. Koinberg IL, Fridlund B, Engholm GB, Holmberg L: Nurse-led follow-up on demand or by a physician after breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004, 8:109–117. discussion 118–120. 37. Brown Loise SPGR: Patient initiated follow up of breast cancer. Psychooncology 2002, 11:346–355. 38. Sandgren AK, McCaul KD: Long-term telephone therapy outcomes for breast cancer patients. Psychooncology 2007, 16:38–47. 39. Sheppard: A randomised controlled trial: comparing the psychological effects of routine follow up versus point of need access only at 2 years post diagnosis of breast cancer. Eur J of Cancer Suppl 2005, 3:7. 40. Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, et al: Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:705–710. 41. Gulliford T, Opomu M, Wilson E, Hanham I, Epstein R: Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study. BMJ 1997, 314:174. 42. Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, et al: Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2009, 13:2–8. 43. Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, et al: Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2010, 10:174. 44. Kimman ML, Voogd AC, Dirksen CD, Falger P, Hupperets P, et al: Improving the quality and efficiency of follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer–rationale and study design of the MaCare trial. BMC Cancer 2007, 7:1. 45. Kimman M, Dirksen C, Lambin P, Boersma L: Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in breast cancer patients in their first year after treatment. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009, 7:11. 46. Chagari Cea: Surveillance partagée des patientes traitées pour un cancer du sein. L'expérience de l'Institut Curie = Shared responsibility for followup of breast cancer patients. Experience of the Institut Curie. Bull Cancer 2008, 95:1047–1051. 47. Lash TL, Clough-Gorr K, Silliman RA, Lash TL, Clough-Gorr K, et al: Reduced rates of cancer-related worries and mortality associated with guideline surveillance after breast cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 89:61–67. 48. Chapman D, Cox E, Britton PD, Wishart GC: Patient-led breast cancer follow up. Breast 2009, 18:100–102. 49. Vaile D, Donovan G, Barrett-Lee P: Breast cancer follow-up with the Velindre model: a mammography-based approach. Synergy 2006, 22–24:26. 50. Montgomery DA: Follow-up by telephone after treatment for breast cancer. BMJ 2009, 338:a2753. 51. Jiwa M, Thompson J, Coleman R, Reed M: Breast cancer follow-up: could primary care be the right venue? Curr Med Res Opin 2006, 22:625–630. 52. Murray SA, Boyd K, Campbell C, Cormie P, Thomas K, et al: Implementing a service users' framework for cancer care in primary care: an action research study. Fam Pract 2008, 25:78–85. 53. Vanhuyse M, Bedard PL, Sheiner J, Fitzgerald B, Clemons M: Transfer of follow-up care to family physicians for early-stage breast cancer. Clin Oncol 2007, 19:172–176. 54. Association_of_Breast_Surgery_at_BASO: Surgical guidelines for the management of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009, : –. doi:10.1016/j. ejso.2009.1001.1008. 55. Pestalozzi B, Castiglione M, On behalf of the EGWG: Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2008, 19:ii7–ii10. 56. Kataja V, Castiglione M, Group Obot EGW: Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009, 20:iv10–iv14. 57. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, et al: Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer.[update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Options for early breast cancer follow-up in primary and secondary care - a scoping review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, 4:CD001768. PMID: 1103472. 58. Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Distante V, Pacini P: Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA 1999, 281(17):1586. 59. Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, et al: Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National research council project on breast cancer follow-up. JAMA. J Am Med Assoc 1994, 271:1593–1597. 60. Donnelly P, Hiller L, Bathers S, Bowden S, Coleman R: Questioning specialists' attitudes to breast cancer follow-up in primary care. Ann Oncol 1467, 18:1467–1476. 61. van Hezewijk M, Hille ETM, Scholten AN, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM, et al: Professionals’ opinion on follow-up in breast cancer patients; perceived purpose and influence of patients’ risk factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011, 37:217–224. 62. Schaapveld M, Visser O, Louwman W, Willemse P, de Vries E, et al: The impact of adjuvant therapy on contralateral breast cancer risk and the prognostic significance of contralateral breast cancer: a population based study in the Netherlands. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008, 110:189–197. 63. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative G: Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy: 133 randomised trials involving 31 000 recurrences and 24 000 deaths among 75 000 women. Lancet 1992, 339:1–15. 64. Bertelsen L, Bernstein L, Olsen JH, Mellemkjaer L, Haile RW, et al: Effect of Systemic adjuvant treatment on risk for contralateral breast cancer in the women's environment, cancer and radiation epidemiology study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008, 100:32–40. 65. Chlebowski RT GM: Adherence to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Oncology 2006, 71:1–9. Epub 2007 Mar 2005. 66. Clough-Gorr KM, Stuck AE, Thwin SS, Silliman RA: Older breast cancer survivors: geriatric assessment domains are associated with poor tolerance of treatment adverse effects and predict mortality over 7 years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:380–386. 67. Ganz PA: Monitoring the physical health of cancer survivors: a survivorship- focused medical history. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:5105–5111. 68. Ganz PA, Greendale GA, Petersen L, Zibecchi L, Kahn B, et al: Managing menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1054–1064. 69. Lebel S, Rosberger Z, Edgar L, Devins G: Emotional distress impacts fear of the future among breast cancer survivors not the reverse. J Cancer Surviv 2009, 117:127. 70. Lebel S, Rosberger Z, Edgar L, Devins GM: Comparison of four common stressors across the breast cancer trajectory. J Psychosom Res 2007, 63:225–232. 71. Cruickshank S, Kennedy C, Lockhart K, Dosser I, Dallas L: Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, (Issue 1):CD005634. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD005634.pub2. 72. McNeely ML, Campbell KL, Rowe BH, Klassen TP, Mackey JR, et al: Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Can Med Assoc J 2006, 175:34–41. 73. Courneya KS, McKenzie DC, Mackey JR, Gelmon K, Reid RD, et al: Moderators of the effects of exercise training in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2008, 112:1845–1853. 74. Milne HM, Wallman KE, Gordon S, Courneya KS, Milne HM, et al: Effects of a combined aerobic and resistance exercise program in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008, 108:279–288. 75. Knols R, Aaronson NK, Uebelhart D, Fransen J, Aufdemkampe G: Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:3830–3842. 76. Nikander R, Sievanen H, Ojala K, Oivanen T, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al: Effect of a vigorous aerobic regimen on physical performance in breast cancer patients - a randomized controlled pilot trial. Acta Oncol 2007, 46:181–186. 77. Irwin ML, Cadmus L, Alvarez-Reeves M, O'Neil M, Mierzejewski E, et al: Recruiting and retaining breast cancer survivors into a randomized controlled exercise trial: the Yale exercise and survivorship study. Cancer 2008, 112:2593–2606. 78. Courneya KS, Segal RJ, Mackey JR, Gelmon K, Reid RD, Friedenreich CM, Ladha AB, Proulx C, Vallance JK, Lane K, et al: Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. In Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Volume 25.; 2007:4396–4404. 79. Mutrie N, Campbell AM, Whyte F, McConnachie A, Emslie C: Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2007, 334:517–520. 80. Hack TF, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Ruether JD, Weir LM, et al: Impact of providing audiotapes of primary adjuvant treatment consultations to women with breast cancer: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:4138–4144. 81. Meneses KD, McNees P, Loerzel VW, Su X, Zhang Y, et al: Transition from treatment to survivorship: effects of a psychoeducational intervention on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 2007, 34:1007–1016. 82. Winzelberg AJ, Classen C, Alpers GW, Roberts H, Koopman C, et al: Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 2003, 97:1164–1173. 83. Taylor KL, Lamdan RM, Siegel JE, Shelby R, Moran-Klimi K, et al: Psychological adjustment among african american breast cancer patients: one-year follow-up results of a randomized psychoeducational group intervention. Health Psychol 2003, 22:316–323. 84. Kog E, Vertommen H, Vandereycken W: Minuchin's psychosomatic family model revised: a concept-validation study using a multitraitmultimethod approach. Fam Process 1987, 26:235–253. 85. Vos PJ, Visser AP, Garssen B, Duivenvoorden HJ, de Haes HC: Effectiveness of group psychotherapy compared to social support groups in patients with primary, non-metastatic breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2007, 25:37–60. 86. Moadel AB, Shah C, Wylie-Rosett J, Harris MS, Patel SR, et al: Randomized controlled trial of yoga among a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:4387–4395. 87. Andersen BL, Yang HC, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz DM, Emery CF, et al: Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer 2008, 113:3450–3458. 88. Robertson CARS, Boachie C, Dixon JM, Fraser C, Hernández RS, et al: The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2011, 15(34):15. 89. Zahl P-H, Gøtzsche PC, Mæhlen J: Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2011, 12:1118–1124. 90. GøtzschePC NM: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, (Issue 1):CD001877. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD001877.pub4. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/52123 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

