Abel, K. and Browner, C. (1998) Selective Compliance with Biomedical Authority and the Uses of Experiential Knowledge. In Lock, M. and Kaufert, P. (eds) Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Ahmed, S., Bryant, L. & Hewison, J. (2007) ‘Balance’ is in the Eye of the Beholder: Providing Information to Support Informed Choices in Antenatal Screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource, Health Expectations, 4, 309-320.
Asch, A. (1999) Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion: A Challenge to Practice and Policy, American Journal of Public Health, 89, 11, 1649-1657.
Atkinson, R. (2008) My Baby, Right or Wrong in The Guardian 10 March 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2008/mar/10/familyandrelationships.disability?INTCMP=SRCH accessed 10 April 2012.
Beeson, D. and Globus, M. (1985) Decision Making: Whether or not to have Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion for X Linked Conditions, American Journal of Medical Genetics, 20, 107-114.
Boardman, F. (2011) Negotiating Discourses of Maternal Responsibility, Disability and Reprogenetics in Lewiecki-Wilson, C. and Cellio, J. (eds) Disability and Mothering: Liminal Spaces of Embodied Knowledge Syracuse University Press.
Boardman, F. (2010) The Role of Experiential Knowledge in the Reproductive Decision Making of Families Genetically at Risk: The Case of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Unpublished Thesis: University of Warwick.
Borkman, T. (1979) Experiential Knowledge: A New Concept for the Analysis of Self-Help Groups, Social Service Review, 50, 3, 445-456.
Bowler, E. (2006) How Will I Cope with a ‘Normal’ Baby? The Guardian11 December 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1969035,00.html accessed 10 April 2012.
Bricher, G. (1999) A Voice for People with Disabilities in the Prenatal Screening Debate, Nursing Inquiry, 6, 1, 65-7.
Brown, L. and Boardman, F. (2011) Accessing the Field: Disability and the Research Process. Social Science & Medicine 72 (1) pp. 23-30.
Bryant, L., Hewison, J. and Green, J. (2005) Attitudes Towards Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination in Women Who Have a Sibling with Down’s Syndrome, Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23, 2, 181-198.
Burns, E. (2010). Developing Email Interview Practices, Sociological Research Online, 15, 4, 8.
Caron-Finterman, J., Broerse, J. and Bunders, J. (2005). The Experiential Knowledge of Patients: A New Resource for Biomedical Research? Social Science and Medicine, 60, 11, 2575-2584.
Chaplin, J., Schweitzer, R. and Perkouldis, S. (2005) Experiences of Prenatal Diagnosis of Spina Bifida or Hydrocephalus in Parents who Decide to Continue with Their Pregnancies, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 151-162.
Chen, E. and Shiffman, J. (2000) Attitudes Toward Genetic Counseling and Prenatal Diagnosis Among a Group of Individuals with Disabilities, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 2, 137-152.
Cox, S. (2003) Stories in Decisions: How At-Risk Individuals Decide to Request Predictive Testing for Huntingdon Disease, Qualitative Sociology, 26, 2, 257-278.
D’Amico, R., Jacopini, G., Vivona, G. and Frontali, M. (1992).Reproductive choices in couples at risk for genetic disease: a qualitative and quantitative analysis, Birth Defects: Original Article Series, 28, 1, 41–6.
D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2005) The Effect of Experiential Knowledge on Construction of Risk Perception in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer, Journal of Genetic Counselling, 14, 55-69.
D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2003) Experiential Knowledge, Moral Agency and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer, Doctoral Thesis: University of British Columbia.
Downing, C. (2005). Negotiating Responsibility: Case Studies of Reproductive Decision-Making and Prenatal Genetic Testing in Families Facing Huntingdon Disease, Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 3, 219-234.
Dreesen, J., Bras, M., de Die-Smulders, C., Dumoulin, J., Cobben, J., Evers, J., Smeets, H. and Geraedts, J. (1998). Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Molecular Human Reproduction, 4, 9, 881-885.
Dubowitz, V. (2008) Ramblings in the History of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Neuromuscular Disorders, 19, 1, 69-73.
Dubowitz, V. (1991) Editorial: Chaos in the classification of the spinal muscular atrophies of childhood, Neuromuscular Disorders, 1, 2, 77-80.
Edwards, S. (2004) Disability, Identity and the ‘Expressivist Objection’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 418-420.
Etchegary, H., Potter, B., Howley, H. Cappelli, M. Coyle, D., Graham, I., Walker, M. and Wilson, B. (2008) The Influence of Experiential Knowledge on Prenatal Screening and Testing Decisions, Genetic Testing, 12, 1, 115-124.
Evers-Kiebooms, G., Denayer, L, Cassiman, J. and Van Den Berghe, H. (1988)Family Planning Decisions After the Birth of a Cystic Fibrosis Child: The Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 23, 143, 38-46.
France, E., Locock, L., Hunt, K., Ziebland, S., Field, K. and Wyke, S. (2011) Imagined Futures: How Experiential Knowledge of Disability Affects Parents’ Decision Making about Fetal Abnormality, Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00672.x.
Fletcher, A. (2002) Making it Better? Disability and Genetic Choice. In Lee, E. (ed) Designer Babies: Where Do we Draw the Line? London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Gibbs, G. (2007) Analyzing Qualitative Data, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Walter De Gruyter Inc.
Gow, J. (2000) A Study Examining the Views About Reproductive Screening Programmes of Young Women With Down’s Syndrome, Spina Bifida and Cystic Fibrosis, Unpublished Thesis: University of Glasgow.
Hallowell, N. (2006) Varieties of Suffering: Living with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer, Health, Risk and Society, 8, 1, 9-26.
Human Genetics Commission. (2011) Increasing Options, Informing Choice, http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/document.asp?DocId=315&CAtegoryId=10 (Accessed 15 March 2012).
Jennifer Trust for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. (2011) http://www.jtsma.org.uk/ (Accessed 3 March 2012).
Kaplan, D. (1999). Prenatal Screening and its Impact on Persons with Disabilities. In Kuhse, H. and Singer, P. (eds) Bioethics: An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kay, E. and Kingston, H. (2002) Feelings Associated with Being a Carrier and Characteristics of Reproductive Decision Making in Women Known to be Carriers of X Linked Conditions, Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 2, 169-181.
Kelly, S. (2009). Choosing not to Choose: Reproductive Responses of Parents of Children with Genetic Conditions or Impairments, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 1, 81-97.
Lancaster, J. (2011). ‘So what if my baby’s born like me?’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b010n37y accessed 16 November 2011.
Larson, E. (1998) Reframing the Meaning of Disability to Families: The Embrace of Paradox, Social Science And Medicine, 47, 7, 865-875.
McCord, J. and Schwaber Kerson, T. (2006). Conducting Intensive Interviews Using Email: A Serendipitous Comparative Opportunity, Qualitative Social Work, 5, 3, 389-406.
National Screening Committee. (2010) Screening Tests for You and Your Baby (Version 6) http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/cms.php?folder=2442 (accessed 29 January 2012).
Opera, G., Kröber, S., McWhorter, M., Rossoll, W., Müller, S., Krawczak, M., Bassell, G., Beattie, C. and Wirth, B. (2008) Plastin 3 is a protective modifier of autosomal recessive Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Science, 320, 524-527.
Parens, E. and Asch, A. (2000) The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Testing: Reflections and Recommendations. In Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Parsons, E. and Atkinson, P. (1992) Lay Constructions of Genetic Risk, Sociology of Health and Illness, 14, 4, 437-455.
Popay, J. and Williams, G. (1996) Public Health Research and Lay Knowledge, Social Science and Medicine, 42, 5, 759-768.
Press, N., Browner, C., Tran, D., Morton, C. and Le Master, B. (1998) Provisional Normalcy and ‘Perfect Babies’: Pregnant Women’s Attitudes Towards Disability in the Context of Prenatal Testing. In Franklin, S. and Ragoné, H. (eds) Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Roberts, C. and Franklin, S. (2004) Experiencing New Forms of Genetic Choice: Findings from an Ethnographic Study of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis, Human Fertility, 7, 4, 285-293.
Shakespeare, T. (1999) Losing the Plot? Medical and Activist Discourses of Contemporary Genetics and Disability, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 5, 669-688.
Stockdale, A. and Terry, S. (2002) Advocacy Groups and the New Genetics. In J. Alper, C. Ard, A. Asch, J. Beckwith, P. Conrad and Geller, L. (eds) The Double-Edged Helix: Social Implications of Genetics in a Diverse Society, Baltimore, M.D. : John Hopkins University Press.
Wertz, D., Janes, S., Rosenfeld, J. and Erbe, R. (1992) Attitudes Toward the Prenatal Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Factors Influencing Decision Making Amongst Affected Families, American Journal of Human Genetics, 50, 5, 1077-1085.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002) What Constitutes Balanced Information in the Practitioners’ Portrayals of Down’s Syndrome? Midwifery,18, 230-237.
Wynne, B. (1996) May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S. Bronislaw, S. and Wynne, B. (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards A New Ecology of Risk, London: Sage.