Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Distributed ontology building as practical work

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Randall, Dave, Procter, Rob, Linc, Yuwei, Poschen, Meik, Sharrock, Wes and Stephens, Robert (2011) Distributed ontology building as practical work. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.69 (No.4). p. 14. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.011

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.011

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Ontologies – a form of structured and logically related knowledge or classification hierarchy embedded in a computer system – are regarded by many scientists as having enormous promise for the consistent use and re-use of data. To realise this promise, however, is not straightforward. In this paper, based on ethnographic observation, we argue that the challenges for ontology building are ‘social’ as much as they are technical. By this we mean the routine work undertaken in the building process and the problems and difficulties entailed can be understood in terms of the practices of knowledge workers and the practical nature of ‘sorting things out’. Getting a better sense of how, in practise, this work gets done gives a sense of the main challenges of building successful ontologies and how this impacts on the design of tool support. In considering the practices of one group in particular, we try to show how, for members, the technical problems of determining what classification structure is appropriate, and what its boundaries might be, depend substantially on assumptions about the ‘community’ and its interests and purposes. This ‘turn to the social’ has ramifications for the understanding of ontology building and use. Specifically, ‘modelling’ approaches to ontology building tell us little about the practical organisation of the work and how this relates to the prospect of successful sharing. Ethnographic enquiry may reveal important issues that are otherwise missed.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Computer Science
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 1071-5819
Official Date: April 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2011Published
Volume: Vol.69
Number: No.4
Page Range: p. 14
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.011
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us