The Library

From open source to open government : a critique of open politics

Tools

Tkacz, Nathaniel. (2012) From open source to open government : a critique of open politics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, Vol.12 (No.4). pp. 386-405. ISSN 1473-2866

[img]
Preview
 Text
WRAP_Tkacz_12-4tkacz.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (816Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Notions of openness are increasingly visible in a great number of political developments, from activist groups, software projects, political writings and the institutions of government. And yet, there has been very little reflection on what openness means, how it functions, or how seemingly radically different groups can all claim it as their own. Openness, it seems, is beyond disagreement and beyond scrutiny. This article considers the recent proliferation of openness as a political concept. By tracing this (re)emergence of ‘the open’ through software cultures in the 1980s and more recently in network cultures, it shows how contemporary political openness functions in relation to a new set of concepts – collaboration, participation and transparency – but also identifies important continuities with previous writings on the open, most notably in the work of Karl Popper and his intellectual ally Friedrich Hayek. By revisiting these prior works in relation to this second coming of the open, the article suggests that there is a critical flaw in how openness functions in relation to politics, beginning with the question: How is that new movements championing openness have emerged within a supposedly already-open society?

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Transparency in government, Open source software -- Social aspects, Information society -- Political aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization
ISSN: 1473-2866
Official Date: November 2012
Dates:
DateEvent
November 2012Published
Volume: Vol.12
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 386-405
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References:

Armstrong, C. (2010) ‘Emergent democracy’, in D. Lathrop and L. Ruma (eds.) Open government:
Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Cambridge: O'Reilly Media.
Becker, B. (2010) ‘A revised contract for America, minus “with” and Newt’, The New York Times, 15 April.
Bentham Open (2010) ‘Welcome to Bentham open access’ [http://www.bentham.org/open/index.htm].
Bergson, H., R. A. Audra, C. Brereton and W. H. Carter (1935) The two sources of morality and religion.
New York: H. Holt and Company.
Berry, D. M. (2008) Copy, rip, burn: The politics of copyleft and open source. London: Pluto.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1960) Problems of life: An evaluation of modern biological and scientific thought. New
York: Harper & Brothers.
Bezroukov, N. (1999) ‘Open source software development as a special type of academic research (critique of
vulgar Raymondism)’, First Monday, 4(10).
Carswell, D. (2009) ‘Open the party; open source politics is coming’, Douglas' Blog
[http://www.talkcarswell.com/show.aspx?id=926].
Coleman, G. (2004) ‘The political agnosticism of free and open source software and the inadvertent politics
of contrast’, Anthropology Quarterly, 77(03): 507-519.
Cornforth, M. (1968) The open philosophy and the open society; A reply to Dr. Karl Popper's refutations of
Marxism. New York: International Publishers.
De Cock, C. and Bohm, S. (2007) ‘Liberalist fantasies: Zizek and the impossibility of the open society’,
Organization, 14(6): 815-836.
Free Software Foundation. (2010) ‘When a company asks for your copyright’
[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/assigning-copyright.html].
Ghosh, R. A. and V. V. Prakash (2000) 'The Orbitan free software survey', First Monday, 5(7).
Government 2.0 Taskforce. (2010) ‘About’ [http://gov2.net.au/about/].
Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2004) Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: The Penguin
Press.
Hayek, F. A. V. (1944) The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.
Kelty, C. M. (2008) Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kendall, W. (1960) ‘The “open society” and its fallacies’, The American Political Science Review, 54(4):
972-979.
King, J. (2006) ‘Openness and its discontents’, in J. Dean, J. W. Anderson and G. Lovink (eds.) Reformatting
politics: Information technology and global civil society. New York: Routledge.
Lathrop, D. and L. Ruma (eds.) (2010) Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in
practice. Cambridge: O'Reilly Media.
Lessig, L. (2005) ‘Open code and open societies’, in J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. A. Hissam and K. R. Lakhani
(eds.) Perspectives on free and open source software. London: The MIT Press.
Lessig, L. (2008) Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.
Levinson, R. B. (1970) In defense of Plato. New York: Russell & Russell.
Magee, B. (1982) Popper. London: Fontana.
MIT Open Courseware. (2010) ‘MIT Open Courseware’ [http://ocw.mit.edu/].
Obama, B. (2009) ‘Transparency and open government’
[http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/].
O'Reilly, T. (2010) ‘Government as a platform’, in D. Lathrop and L. Ruma (eds.) Open government:
Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Cambridge: O'Reilly Media.
Open Courseware Consortium (2010) ‘Open courseware consortium’ [http://www.ocwconsortium.org].
Open Everything Contributors (2010) ‘Open everything’ [http://openeverything.wik.is].
Open Humanities Press (2010) ‘About: Principles and goals’ [http://openhumanitiespress.org/goals.html].
Open Humanities Press (2010) ‘Open humanities press’ [http://openhumanitiespress.org/index.html].
Open Medicine (2010) ‘Mission’ [http://www.openmedicine.ca/pages/view/Mission].
Open Medicine (2010) ‘Open access’ [http://www.openmedicine.ca/pages/view/Open%20Access].
P2P Foundation Contributors (2010) ‘The foundation for P2P alternatives’
[http://p2pfoundation.net/The_Foundation_for_P2P_Alternatives].
Plato (1974) The Republic. Harmondsworth; Baltimore: Penguin.
Popper, K. R. (1962) The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Raymond, E. S. (2000) ‘The cathedral and the bazaar’ [http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/].
Rosenberg, J. (2009) ‘The meaning of open’ [http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/12/meaning-ofopen.
html].
Rushkoff, D. (2003) Open source democracy: How online communication is changing offline politics.
London: Demos [http://rushkoff.com/books/open-source-democracy].
Shearmur, J. (1996) The political thought of Karl Popper. London; New York: Routledge.
The Open Knowledge Foundation (2010) ‘Projects’ [http://www.okfn.org/projects].
The Open Knowledge Foundation (2010) ‘About Us’ [http://www.okfn.org/about].
The Open Knowledge Foundation (2010) ‘Our Vision’ [http://www.okfn.org/vision].
Tkacz, N. (2010) ‘Wikipedia and the politics of mass collaboration', Platform: Journal of Media and
Communication, 2(2).
Vernon, R. (1976) ‘The “great society” and the “open society”: Liberalism in Hayek and Popper’, Canadian
Journal of Political Science, 9(2): 261-276.
Wikipedia Contributors (2010) ‘Wikipedia: About’, Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About].
Williams, S. (2002) Free as in freedom: Richard Stallman's crusade for free software. Sebastopol, CA:
O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/53295

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics