Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Near broke, but no tramp : Billie Ritchie, Charlie Chaplin and 'that costume'

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Burrows, Jon (2010) Near broke, but no tramp : Billie Ritchie, Charlie Chaplin and 'that costume'. Early Popular Visual Culture, 8 (3). pp. 247-262. doi:10.1080/17460654.2010.498162

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2010.498162

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article revisits the various claims and counter-claims that have been made over the years as to whether the 1910s music hall comedian turned slapstick film star Billie Ritchie stole his costume and comic persona from Charlie Chaplin, or was himself the victim of plagiarism on Chaplin's part. It proposes that neither of these arguments can be definitively supported on the basis of evidence available in the public domain, but also draws attention to the fact that there are other factors in play that may plausibly explain the various similarities between the two comedians as the result of shared formative influences rather than outright imitation, and that some contemporaries deemed it eminently reasonable to take such a view. The article moves on to consider the significance of the fact that, although their costumes were practically identical, Ritchie typically played dissolute gentlemen of ambiguous class status rather than tramps. It concludes that there is a stronger argument to be made that, rather than seeking to represent vagrancy, both Chaplin and Ritchie originally used the iconic 'tramp' costume to poke fun at the culturally ubiquitous Edwardian figure of the 'masher' - a lower-middle- or working-class male pleasure-seeker trying (and in their incarnations, failing) to emulate the fashions of his social superiors.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN1993 Motion Pictures
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > Film and Television Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Early Popular Visual Culture
Publisher: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
ISSN: 1746-0654
Official Date: August 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2010Published
Volume: 8
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 16
Page Range: pp. 247-262
DOI: 10.1080/17460654.2010.498162
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us