Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Seers, Kate, Crichton, Nicola, Martin, June, Coulson, Katrina and Carroll, Dawn. (2008) A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain. BMC Nursing, Vol.7 (No.10). ISSN 1472-6955

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Seers_Randomised_Controlled.pdf - Published Version

Download (297Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-7-10

Abstract

Background: Massage is increasingly used to manage chronic pain but its benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a single session of nurse-administered massage for the short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain and anxiety. Methods: A randomised controlled trial design was used, in which the patients were assigned to a massage or control group. The massage group received a 15 minute manual massage and the control group a 15 minute visit to talk about their pain. Adult patients attending a pain relief unit with a diagnosis of chronic pain whose pain was described as moderate or severe were eligible for the study. An observer blind to the patients' treatment group carried out assessments immediately before (baseline), after treatment and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. Pain was assessed using 100 mm visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain Relief was assessed using a five point verbal rating scale. Anxiety was assessed with the Spielberger short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: 101 patients were randomised and evaluated, 50 in the massage and 51 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline interview. Patients in the massage but not the control group had significantly less pain compared to baseline immediately after and one hour post treatment. 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean pain reduction at one hour post treatment between the massage and control groups is 5.47 mm to 24.70 mm. Patients in the massage but not the control group had a statistically significant reduction in anxiety compared to baseline immediately after and at 1 hour post treatment. Conclusion: Massage is effective in the short term for chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Chronic pain, Massage therapy
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Nursing
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1472-6955
Date: 4 July 2008
Volume: Vol.7
Number: No.10
Identification Number: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-10
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Oxfordshire Health Services Research Fund
References: 1. Rankin-Box D: Therapies in practice: a survey assessing nurses' use of complementary therapies. Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery 1997, 3:92-98. 2. Ernst E, White A: The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2000, 8:32-36. 3. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Rompay MV, Kessler RC: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Results of a follow-up national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998, 280:1569-1575. 4. Wiesenger GF, Quittan M, Ebenbichler G, Kaider A, Fialka V: Benefit and costs of passive modalities in back pain outpatients: a descriptive study. European Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 1977, 7:182-186. 5. Mills S, Budd S: Professional organisation of complementary and alternative medicine in the United Kingdom 2000. A second report to the Department of Health Centre for Complementary Health Studies, University of Exeter; 2000. 6. White House Commission: White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy. Final Report 2002 [http://www.whc camp.hhs.gov/finalreport_pdf.html]. Accessed 8th June 2007 7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence [http:// www.nice.org.uk/]. Accessed 8th June 2007 8. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) [http:// www.nhshealthquality.org/]. Accessed 8th June 2007 9. Agency for Health Care Research & Quality [http:// www.ahrq.gov/]. Accessed 8th June 2007 10. National Institute of Clinical Studies [http://www.nicsl.com.au/ ]. Accessed 8th June 2007 11. Furlan AD, Brosseau L, Imamura M, Irvin E: Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002:CD001929. 12. Preyde M: Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute lowback pain: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2000, 162(13):1815-1820. 13. Hernandez-Reif M, Filed T, Krasnegor J, Theakston H: Lower back pain is reduced and range of motion increased after massage therapy. International Journal of Neuroscience 106:131-145. 14. Sunshine W, Field T, Quintino O, Fierro K, Kuhn C, Burman I, Schanberg S: Fibromyalgia benefits from massage therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 1996, 2:18-22. 15. Field T, Peck M, Krugman S, Tuchel T, Schanberg S, Kuhn C, Burman I: Burn injuries benefit from massage therapy. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation 1998, 19:241-244. 16. Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Seligman S, Krasnegor J, Sunshine W: Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: benefits from massage therapy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1997, 22:607-617. 17. Williamson A, Hoggart B: Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2005, 14(7):798-804. 18. Melzack R: The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975, 1:277-299. 19. Marteau TM, Bekker H: The development of a six-item shortform of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1992, 31:301-306. 20. McQuay HJ, Moore RA, Eccleston C, Morely S, Williams AC: Systematic review of outpatient servies for chronic pain control. Health Technol Assess 1997, 1(6):1-135. 21. Campbell MJ, Machin D: Medical Statistics A common sense approach 3rd edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1999. 22. Ceccio CM: Postoperative pain relief through relaxation in elderly patients with fractured hips. Orthopaedic Nursing 1984, 3:11-19. 23. Royal College of Nursing: Complementary therapies in nursing, midwifery and health visiting practice. RCN guidance on integrating complementary therapies into clinical care RCN, London; 2003.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/534

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us