Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Bayesian model selection in high-dimensional settings

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Johnson, Valen E. and Rossell, David (2012) Bayesian model selection in high-dimensional settings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol.107 (No.498). pp. 649-660. doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.682536

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.682536

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Standard assumptions incorporated into Bayesian model selection procedures result in procedures that are not competitive with commonly used penalized likelihood methods. We propose modifications of these methods by imposing nonlocal prior densities on model parameters. We show that the resulting model selection procedures are consistent in linear model settings when the number of possible covariates p is bounded by the number of observations n, a property that has not been extended to other model selection procedures. In addition to consistently identifying the true model, the proposed procedures provide accurate estimates of the posterior probability that each identified model is correct. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that these model selection procedures perform as well or better than commonly used penalized likelihood methods in a range of simulation settings. Proofs of the primary theorems are provided in the Supplementary Material that is available online.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher: American Statistical Association
ISSN: 0162-1459
Official Date: July 2012
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2012Published
Volume: Vol.107
Number: No.498
Page Range: pp. 649-660
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.682536
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us