Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The sensitivity of focused electrical impedance measurements

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Islam, Naimul, Rabbani, K. Siddique-e and Wilson, Adrian J. (2010) The sensitivity of focused electrical impedance measurements. Physiological Measurement, Vol.31 (No.8). S97-S109. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/31/8/S08 ISSN 0967-3334.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/8/S08

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

One of the problems with tetrapolar impedance measurements is the lack of spatial sensitivity within the measured volume. In this paper we compare the sensitivity of tetrapolar measurements and the focused impedance measurements (FIM) proposed by Rabbani et al (1999 Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 873 408-20), which give an improved sensitivity profile. Using a previously validated model of sensitivity based on Geselowitz's lead theory, the sensitivity of FIM using eight, six and four electrodes was investigated. All electrode configurations showed a maximum in the average sensitivity of a plane at a depth of one-third of the drive-receive electrode spacing. No difference was found in the sensitivity value of this maximum between electrode configurations having the same drive-receive electrode spacing. The six-and eight-electrode configurations showed negative sensitivity regions down to half of the drive-receive electrode spacing, whilst the four-electrode measurement showed negative sensitivity regions down to one-third of the drive-receive electrode spacing. The single peak in sensitivity beneath the centre of the electrode configuration became dominant at 0.56, 1.4 and 0.14 of the receive electrode spacing for the eight-, six- and four-electrode configurations respectively. Thus, the four-electrode FIM configuration gives a single peak closest to the surface.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
R Medicine
Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Physics
Journal or Publication Title: Physiological Measurement
Publisher: Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0967-3334
Official Date: August 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2010Published
Volume: Vol.31
Number: No.8
Number of Pages: 13
Page Range: S97-S109
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/8/S08
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Title of Event: 10th International Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography
Location of Event: Univ Manchester, Sch Math, Manchester, ENGLAND
Date(s) of Event: JUN 15-19, 2009

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us