The Library
In defence of ANT : a reply to Johan Söderberg
Tools
Tools
Tools
Tkacz, Nathaniel (2011) In defence of ANT : a reply to Johan Söderberg. Journal of Peer Production (No.0).
Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/debate-an...
Abstract
In response to Söderberg, Nathaniel Tkacz argues that the political insights afforded by ANT are not reducible to the Marxist tradition. He argues that ANT is especially well suited to describe how force flows through peer-production projects – projects which already perform their own critique of Capital. The final installment of this debate sees O’Neil argue that ANT’s ignorance of history and justice prevents it from constituting a credible alternative.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Peer Production | ||||
| Publisher: | Foundation for P2P Alternatives | ||||
| ISSN: | 2213-5316 | ||||
| Official Date: | July 2011 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Number: | No.0 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
