Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Chest compression rate : where is the sweet spot?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nolan, J. P., Perkins, Gavin D. and Soar, J. (2012) Chest compression rate : where is the sweet spot? Circulation, Volume 125 (Number 24). pp. 2968-2970. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.112722 ISSN 0009-7322.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.112.1127...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The first description of modern cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) included the instruction to compress the chest 'about 60 times per minute';1 however, the optimal compression rate was unknown. Franz Koenig is credited with describing the original technique for external cardiac massage, which included a compression rate of 30-40min1,2 But in the first published description of external cardiac massage in 1892, Friedrich Maass documented a better clinical response with a rate of 120 min1,2 To this day, the optimal compression rate is the subject of controversy. Animal data indicate that cardiac output increases with compression rates up to as high as 150 min1,3 In a canine model of prolonged cardiac arrest, compression rates of 120 min1 compared to 60 min1 increased mean aortic (systolic and diastolic) and coronary perfusion pressures, and 24 hour survival (61% versus 15%, P=0.03).4 In a study of nine patients undergoing CPR, a compression rate of 120 min1 generated higher aortic peak pressures and coronary perfusion pressures compared with a compression rate of 60 min1 (the rate recommended by the 1980 American Heart Association guidelines). This evidence is supported by another study of 23 patients in cardiac arrest in which compressions at 120 min1 resulted in significantly higher end-tidal carbon dioxide values compared with compressions at 80 min1,5

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Circulation
Publisher: American Heart Association
ISSN: 0009-7322
Official Date: 2012
Dates:
DateEvent
2012Published
Volume: Volume 125
Number: Number 24
Page Range: pp. 2968-2970
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.112722
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us