Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A design of experiments (DoE) approach to material properties optimization of electrospun nanofibers

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Coles, Stuart R., Jacobs, Daniel K., Meredith, James O., Barker, Guy C., Clark, A. J. (Andrew J.), Kirwan, Kerry, Stanger, Jonathan and Tucker, Nick. (2010) A design of experiments (DoE) approach to material properties optimization of electrospun nanofibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol.117 (No.4). pp. 2251-2257. ISSN 0021-8995

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.32022

Abstract

Using an electrospinning technique, polymer materials have been spun using electrostatic potential to create a fiber mat. To develop the electrospinning opportunities available for practical applications, it is important that a full understanding of process parameters is achieved. These fundamental principles will form the initial framework of future research with the effects on polymer output examined as the primary focus of this article. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVOH) and polylactic acid (PLA) polymer solutions were developed and a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach implemented, to determine whether the variation of factors led to significant effects on fiber output. Parameters altered were conductivity, concentration (% w/w), electrostatic potential, and the collection distance at which the fiber was obtained. Results taken considered the fiber diameter, deposition rate of material, current achieved at the point of collection and whether or not the material was actually able to electrospin and visibly produce polymer fiber. The results of this work indicate the presence of interactions between the processing parameters and as such allow a fine tuning process to be used to adapt production of the micro- and nanofibers to suit a desired application with specific materials properties. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 117: 2251-2257, 2010

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
T Technology > T Technology (General)
T Technology > TS Manufactures
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Nanotechnology, Electrospinning, Lactic acid, Polymers, Polyvinyl alcohol, Surface chemistry
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ISSN: 0021-8995
Date: 15 August 2010
Volume: Vol.117
Number: No.4
Number of Pages: 7
Page Range: pp. 2251-2257
Identification Number: 10.1002/app.32022
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Warwick Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre (WIMRC)
Version or Related Resource: Paper also presented at the Society for Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) Fall Technical Conference, Memphis, TN, U.S.A., Sep 8-11, 2008.
References: 1. Cooley, J. F. (Charles S. Farquhar and Ambrose Eastman). U.S. Pat. 692,631, 1902, p 7. 2. Morton, W. J. U.S. Pat. 705,691 (1902). 3. Formhals, A. U.S. Pat. 1,975,504 (1934). 4. Chronakis, I. S. J Mater Process Technol 2005, 167, 283. 5. Dalton, P. D.; Grafahrend, D.; Klinkhammer, K.; Klee, D.; Moeller, M. Polymer 2007, 48, 6823. 6. Huang, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y. Z.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Compos Sci Technol 2003, 63, 2223. 7. Schiffman, J. D.; Schauer, C. L. Polym Rev 2008, 48, 317. 8. Agarwal, S.; Wendorff, J. H.; Greiner, A. Polymer 2008, 49, 5603. 9. Lee, J. S.; Choi, K. H.; Ghim, H. D.; Kim, S. S.; Chun, D. H.; Kim, H. Y.; Lyoo, W. S. J Appl Polym Sci 2004, 93, 1638. 10. Zhang, C.; Yuan, X.; Wu, L.; Han, Y.; Sheng, J. Eur Polym J 2005, 41, 423. 11. Stanger, J.; Staiger, M. P.; Tucker, N.; Kirwan, K. Solid State Phenom 2009, 151, 54. 12. Son, W. K.; Youk, J. H.; Lee, T. S.; Park, W. H. Mater Lett 2005, 59, 1571. 13. Thompson, C. J.; Chase, G. G.; Yarin, A. L.; Reneker, D. H. Polymer 2007, 48, 6913. 14. Gu, S. Y.; Ren, J.; Vancso, G. J. Eur Polym J 2005, 41, 2559. 15. Yoerdem, O. S.; Papila, M.; Menceloglu, Y. Z. Mater & Des 2007, 29, 34. 16. Chen, J.-P.; Ho, K.-H.; Chiang, Y.-P.; Wu, K.-W. J Membr Sci 2009, 340, 9. 17. Megelski, S.; Stephens, J. S.; Chase, D. B.; Rabolt, J. F. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 8456. 18. Ner, Y.; Stuart, J. A.; Whited, G.; Sotzing, G. A. Polymer 2009, 50, 5828. 19. Sukigara, S.; Gandhi, M.; Ayutsede, J.; Micklus, M.; Ko, F. Polymer 2004, 45, 3701. 20. Sill Travis, J.; Von Recum Horst, A. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 1989. 21. Yang, F.; Murugan, R.; Wang, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 2603. 22. Zong, X.; Bien, H.; Chung, C.-Y.; Yin, L.; Fang, D.; Hsiao, B. S.; Chu, B.; Entcheva, E. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 5330. 23. Piskin, E.; Bolgen, N.; Egri, S.; Isoglu, I. A. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 441. 24. Deng, X.-L.; Sui, G.; Zhao, M.-L.; Chen, G.-Q.; Yang, X.-P. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2007, 18, 117. 25. Electrospinz. Available at: http://www.electrospinz.co.nz. accessed Septemper 2008. 26. Dove, S. B. UTHSCSA2002. Available at: http://ddsdx.uthscsa. edu/dig/itdesc.html. accessed September 2008. 27. Taylor, G. I. Proc R Soc Lond A 1964, 280, 383. 28. Morozov, V. N.; Morozova, T. Y.; Kallenbach, N. R. Int J Mass Spectrom 1998, 178, 143. 29. Briscoe, B.; Luckham, P.; Zhu, S. Polymer 2000, 41, 3851. 30. Mccullen, S. D.; Stano, K. L.; Stevens, D. R.; Roberts, W. A.; Monteiro-Riviere, N. A.; Clarke, L. I.; Gorga, R. E. J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 105, 1668. 31. Zong, X.; Kim, K.; Fang, D.; Ran, S.; Hsiao, B. S.; Chu, B. Polymer 2002, 43, 4403. 32. Tan, S. H.; Inai, R.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Polymer 2005, 46, 6128. 33. Chase, G. G.; Reneker, D. H. Fluid/Particle Sep J 2004, 16, 105.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/5685

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us