Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kunar, Melina A., Rich, Anina N. and Wolfe, Jeremy M. (2010) Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search. Visual Cognition, Vol.18 (No.6). pp. 881-897. doi:10.1080/13506280903361988 ISSN 1350-6285.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280903361988

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Recent research has shown that, in visual search, participants can miss 30-40% of targets when they only appear rarely (i.e., on 1-2% of trials). Low target prevalence alters the behaviour of the searcher. It can lead participants to quit their search prematurely (Wolfe, Horowitz, & Kenner, 2005), to shift their decision criteria (Wolfe et al., 2007), and/or to make motor or response errors (Fleck & Mitroff, 2007). In this paper we examine whether the low prevalence (LP) effect can be ameliorated if we split the search set in two, spreading the task out over space and/or time. Observers searched for the letter "T" among "L"s. In Experiment 1, the left or right half of the display was presented to the participants before the second half. In Experiment 2, items were spatially intermixed but half of the items were presented first, followed by the second half. Experiment 3 followed the methods of Experiment 2 but allowed observers to correct perceived errors. All three experiments produced robust LP effects with higher errors at 2% prevalence than at 50% prevalence. Dividing up the display had no beneficial effect on errors. The opportunity to correct errors reduced but did not eliminate the LP effect. Low prevalence continues to elevate errors even when observers are forced to slow down and permitted to correct errors.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Searching behavior, Visual perception, Attention, Airline passenger security screening, Space and time
Journal or Publication Title: Visual Cognition
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1350-6285
Official Date: 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
2010Published
Volume: Vol.18
Number: No.6
Number of Pages: 17
Page Range: pp. 881-897
DOI: 10.1080/13506280903361988
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (NIH), United States. Dept. of Homeland Security, National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Menzies Foundation, University of Warwick
Grant number: EY17001 (NIH), 359244 (NHMRC/MF)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us