Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Usefulness of group feedback analysis as a research method : its application to a questionnaire study

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Brown, Alan and Heller, Frank (1981) Usefulness of group feedback analysis as a research method : its application to a questionnaire study. Human Relations, Volume 34 (Number 2). pp. 141-156. doi:10.1177/001872678103400204

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872678103400204

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a field research method called group feedback analysis (GFA) applied in two British companies. The study used two phases of questionnaire administration separated by over 12 months. Three majorfunctions of GFA are elaborated and analyzed with examples based, in part, on tape-recorded sessions: (1) validation of the results; (2) producing a deeper understanding of the data; and (3) providing an opportunity for mutual learning.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Employment Research
Journal or Publication Title: Human Relations
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0018-7267
Official Date: 1981
Dates:
DateEvent
1981Published
Volume: Volume 34
Number: Number 2
Page Range: pp. 141-156
DOI: 10.1177/001872678103400204
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us