The Library
Evaluating automotive sound quality : the disconnect between market research and structured evaluations
Tools
Ahtamad, Mujthaba (2013) Evaluating automotive sound quality : the disconnect between market research and structured evaluations. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
|
Text
WRAP_THESIS_Ahtamad_2013.pdf - Submitted Version Download (5Mb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2691115~S1
Abstract
Understanding how customers evaluate product attributes is a vital part of New Product Development
(NPD). Vehicles in particular have many attributes which can contribute to a positive perception of the
vehicle and its brand. The attribute of vehicle Sound Quality (SQ) is particularly important and
automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) employ a variety of techniques to collect
customers’ subjective evaluations of SQ in NPD, both during product development and after purchase.
There are two main techniques for collecting customers’ subjective evaluations: structured evaluations
and market research.
Structured evaluations are conducted in controlled experimental conditions. This allows engineers to set
targets for the design of automotive SQ for new vehicles. Market research on the other hand, is carried
out in an unstructured manner, and does not inform engineers of the underlying criteria vehicle owners
use to evaluate vehicle SQ. Nevertheless, market research can be influential for attracting new customers,
therefore it is important for OEMs to achieve favourable ratings. However, it is currently not understood
how market research methods compare to structured evaluations for automotive SQ, which leads to low
confidence in interpreting customer data.
A preliminary study examined customer data issues facing an automotive OEM and confirmed the need to
further understand vehicle owners’ decision-making and behaviour in evaluations. Therefore, this
research aims to answer the question, how do the decision-making criteria used by assessors compare
between market research techniques and structured evaluations?
By adopting a psychological approach, a second study was conducted to examine customers’ decisionmaking
in automotive SQ structured evaluations and in a market research survey. Verbal Protocols were
used as the primary data collection method. The second study identified four decision-making criteria
which were used by assessors when evaluating automotive SQ in a listening room structured evaluation
and a market research survey. The criteria were classified into 1) behavioural scenarios, 2) attribute
criteria, 3) comparisons and 4) expectations. An Odds Ratio showed vehicle owners in a market research
setting were twice as likely to use behavioural scenarios in comparison to a structured evaluation. Vehicle
owners in the structured evaluation, made more comparisons to specific stimuli that were experienced and
focussed on the sound stimulus presented as opposed to behavioural scenarios.
A third study investigated customer decision-making in an interactive vehicle simulator, which was most
representative of real-life driving. Behavioural scenarios were used by vehicle owners, in a similar
frequency as those in a market research survey, which validates the usage of simulators in NPD.
Simulators are therefore important tools to help experts anticipate how vehicles will be evaluated in
market research. This thesis provides experts with the knowledge of how vehicle owners evaluate their
vehicles in market research surveys and as a result it can inform the design of structured evaluations,
which occur earlier in NPD, before the post-purchase market research has taken place.
This thesis demonstrates a behavioural disconnect between structured evaluations and market research
techniques. It provides knowledge on the decision-making criteria which vehicle owners use to evaluate
vehicle SQ in structured evaluations and market research. This knowledge can ultimately give engineers
more confidence in interpreting customer data and the ability to better anticipate customer responses,
through a better understanding of how vehicle owners evaluate vehicle SQ, rather than just knowing their
preferences. It also validates the use of vehicle simulators in NPD.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) T Technology > TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Marketing research, Acoustical engineering, Automobile sounds | ||||
Official Date: | February 2013 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Warwick Manufacturing Group | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Jennings, Paul | ||||
Sponsors: | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC); Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC); Warwick Manufacturing Group | ||||
Extent: | xii, 205 leaves : illustrations. | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year