Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Nurses' perceptions and experiences of communication in the operating theatre: a focus group interview

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nestel, Debra and Kidd , Jane. (2006) Nurses' perceptions and experiences of communication in the operating theatre: a focus group interview. BMC Nursing, Vol.5 (No.1). ISSN 1472-6955

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Kidd_Nurses_perceptions.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (286Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-5-1

Abstract

Abstract Nurses' perceptions and experiences of communication in the operating theatre: a focus group interview Background Communication programmes are well established in nurse education. The focus of programmes is most often on communicating with patients with less attention paid to inter-professional communication or skills essential for working in specialised settings. Although there are many anecdotal reports of communication within the operating theatre, there are few empirical studies. This paper explores communication behaviours for effective practice in the operating theatre as perceived by nurses and serves as a basis for developing training. Methods A focus group interview was conducted with seven experienced theatre nurses from a large London teaching hospital. The interview explored their perceptions of the key as well as unique features of effective communication skills in the operating theatre. Data was transcribed and thematically analysed until agreement was achieved by the two authors. Results There was largely consensus on the skills deemed necessary for effective practice including listening, clarity of speech and being polite. Significant influences on the nature of communication included conflict in role perception and organisational issues. Nurses were often expected to work outside of their role which either directly or indirectly created barriers for effective communication. Perceptions of a lack of collaborative team effort also influenced communication. Conclusion Although fundamental communication skills were identified for effective practice in the operating theatre, there were significant barriers to their use because of confusion over clarity of roles (especially nurses' roles) and the implications for teamwork. Nurses were dissatisfied with several aspects of communication. Future studies should explore the breadth and depth of this dissatisfaction in other operating theatres, its impact on morale and importantly on patient safety. Interprofessional communication training for operating theatre staff based in part on the key issues identified in this study may help to create clarity in roles and focus attention on effective teamwork and promote clinical safety.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Operating room nursing, Nursing specialties, Communication in medicine
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Nursing
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1472-6955
Date: 8 February 2006
Volume: Vol.5
Number: No.1
Identification Number: 10.1186/1472-6955-5-1
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: 1. Chant S, Jenkinson T, Randle J, Russell G: Communication skills: some problems in nursing education. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2002, 11:12-21. 2. Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry [http://www.bristolinquiry. org.uk/final_report/report/] 3. Keelan JA, Stokoe SJ: Taking the stress out of OR communication. AORN J 1983, 37(5):847-53. 4. Swenson P: Communicating with surgeons, once you learn the language, is possible most of the time. AORN J 1984, 40(5):784-5. 5. Koerner M, Gatch G, Taylor C: Communicating in the OR. Part 1: An overview. AORN J 1984, 39(7):1158-62. 6. Koerner M, Gatch G, Taylor C: Communicating in the OR. Part 2: Listening. AORN J 1985, 40(6):858-66. 7. Koerner M, Gatch G, Taylor C: Communicating in the OR. Part 3: Confrontation. AORN J 1985, 42(2):244-7. 250–5, 258–9 8. Stewart SM: Professional survival tips: communicating effectively with peers. Perioper Nurs Q 1987, 3(3):63-65. 9. Bell A: I'm not sure what you want but I want it now. Natnews 1989, 26(8):17. 10. Larson BA, Martinson DJ: Words can hurt. Dealing with verbal abuse in the operating room. AORN J 1990, 52(6):1238-41. 11. Bowen M, Davidhizar R: Let's talk about it. Communication in the OR. Today's OR Nurse 1991, 13(1):11-5. 12. Pokalo CL: Verbal abuse and sexual harassment in the OR. Todays OR Nurse 1991, 13(9):4-7. 13. Ball KA: Who's listening to whom? AORN J 1992, 56(5):824-7. 14. Woods AC: Communication – a theatre art. Br J Theatre Nurs 1992, 2(2):10-2. 15. Davidhizar R, Bowen M: Responding to irritable people in the OR setting. Today's OR Nurse 1993, 15(5):43-7. 16. Schaefer HG, Helmreich RL, Scheidegger D: Safety in the operating theatre – part 1: interpersonal relationships and team performance. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 1995, 6:48-53. 17. Blakeley JA, Ribeiro V, Hughes A: Managing rumor and gossip in operating room settings. Semin Perioper Nurs 1996, 5(3):111-8. 18. Davidhizar R, Dowd S: Surgeon – assistant communication. Today's Surg Nurse 1998, 20(3):33-6. 19. Radford M, Hunt L: Development of a meaningful learning environment in theatres. Br J Nurs 8(9):611-6. 1999, May 13–26 20. Moss JA, Xiao Y, Zubaidah S: The operating room charge nurse: coordinator and communicator. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:478-82. 21. Lingard L, Reznick R, Espin S, Regehr G, DeVito I: Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine 2002, 77(3):232-7. 22. Lingard L, Reznick R, DeVito I, Espin S: Forming professional identities on the health care team: discursive constructions of the "other" in the operating room. Medical Education 2002, 36:728-734. 23. McGarvey HE, Chambers MGA, Boore JRP: Exploratory study of nursing in an operating departmenmt: preliminary findings on the role of the nurse. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 1999, 15:346-356. 24. Tanner J, Timmons S: Backstage in the theatre. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 32(4):975-980. 25. op cit 24. . 26. op cit 21. . 27. op cit 22. . 28. op cit 21. . 29. op cit 23. . 30. McGarvey HE, Chambers MGA, Boore JRP: Development and definition of the role of the operating department nurse: A review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 32(5):1092-1100. 31. Carrington AC: Theatre nursing as a profession. British Journal of Theatre Nursing 1991, 1(1):5-7. 26 32. Grundemann BJ: Analysis of the role of the professional staff nurse in the operating room. Nursing Research 1970, 19:349-353. 33. Hanson RL, Nelson AH: OR personnel functions: testing of observability. AORN Journal 1985, 42(3):376-387. 34. Roberts S: Going, going, gone? Nursing Times 1989, 85(40):61-65. 35. Johnson G: Non-nursing duties in theatre. Part 1. British Journal of Nursing 1991, 1(3):24-25. 36. Johnson G: Non-nursing duties in theatre. Part 2. British Journal of Nursing 1991, 1(4):20-22. 37. National Association of Theatre Nurses: The role of the nurse as first assistant in the operating department. NATN, Harrogate 1993. 38. op cit 23. . 39. Fisher BJ, Peterson C: She won't be dancing much anyway: a study of surgeons, surgical nurses and elderly patients. Qualitative Health Research 1993, 3(2):165-183. 40. Svensson R: The interplay between doctors and nurses: a negotiated order perspective. Sociology of Health and Illness 1996, 18:379-398. 41. Harvey J: Upskilling and the intensification of work: The extended role in intensive care nursing and midwifery. The Sociological Review 1995, 43:765-781. 42. Mackay L: Conflicts in Care. Medicine and Nursing Chapman and Hall: London; 1993. 43. op cit 23. . 44. op cit 4–15. . 45. Timmons S, Tanner J: Operating theatre nurses: Emotional labour and the hostess role. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2005, 11:85-91. 46. op cit 23. . 47. Howard SK, Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Yang GS, Sarnquist FH: Anaesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anaesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992, 63:763-70. 48. Sexton B, Marsch S, Helmreich R, Betzendoerfer D, Kocher T, Schneidegger D: Participants evaluation of team oriented medical simulation. In Simulators in Anaesthesiology Education Edited by: Henson LC, Lee H. New York: Plenum; 1998:107-108. 49. Pizzi L, Goldfarb N, Nash D: Crew Resource Management and its applications in medicine. In Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices Volume 44. Edited by: Shojana K, Duncan B, McDonald K, Wachter R. Washington DC: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2001:511-519. 50. Belbin M: Team Roles at Work London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1994. 51. Handy C: Gods of Management: The Changing World of Organisations Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. 52. Kanter E: Men and Women of the Corporation Revised edition. NY: Basic Books; 1993. 53. op cit 21. . 54. op cit 22. . 55. Lave J, Wenger E: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. 56. op cit 2. .
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/586

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us