Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Of black swans and tossed coins : is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ludvig, Elliot Andrew and Spetch, Marcia Louise (2011) Of black swans and tossed coins : is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events? PLoS One, Volume 6 (Number 6). Article number e20262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020262 ISSN 1932-6203.

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Ludvig_journal.pone.0020262.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (491Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020262

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

When faced with risky decisions, people tend to be risk averse for gains and risk seeking for losses (the reflection effect). Studies examining this risk-sensitive decision making, however, typically ask people directly what they would do in hypothetical choice scenarios. A recent flurry of studies has shown that when these risky decisions include rare outcomes, people make different choices for explicitly described probabilities than for experienced probabilistic outcomes. Specifically, rare outcomes are overweighted when described and underweighted when experienced. In two experiments, we examined risk-sensitive decision making when the risky option had two equally probable (50%) outcomes. For experience-based decisions, there was a reversal of the reflection effect with greater risk seeking for gains than for losses, as compared to description-based decisions. This fundamental difference in experienced and described choices cannot be explained by the weighting of rare events and suggests a separate subjective utility curve for experience.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Risk-taking (Psychology), Decision making
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
Publisher: Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1932-6203
Official Date: June 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2011Published
Volume: Volume 6
Number: Number 6
Page Range: Article number e20262
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020262
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 26 December 2015
Date of first compliant Open Access: 26 December 2015
Funder: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Alberta Gaming Research Institute (AGRI)
Grant number: 38861 (NSERC)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us