Scope, Alison, Leaviss, Joanna, Kaltenthaler, E. (Eva), Parry, Glenys, Sutcliffe, P. (Paul), Bradburn, Mike and Cantrell, Anna (2013) Is group cognitive behaviour therapy for postnatal depression evidence-based practice? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, Volume 13 (Number 1). Article number 321. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-321

Preview

Text WRAP_Sutcliffe_1471-244X-13-321.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 2.0.. Download (381Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background:
There is evidence that psychological therapies including cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) may be effective in reducing postnatal depression (PND) when offered to individuals. In clinical practice, this is also implemented in a group therapy format, which, although not recommended in guidelines, is seen as a cost-effective alternative. To consider the extent to which group methods can be seen as evidence-based, we systematically review and synthesise the evidence for the efficacy of group CBT compared to currently used packages of care for women with PND, and we discuss further factors which may contribute to clinician confidence in implementing an intervention.

Methods:
Seventeen electronic databases were searched. All full papers were read by two reviewers and a third reviewer was consulted in the event of a disagreement on inclusion. Selected studies were quality assessed, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, were data extracted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction form and statistically synthesised where appropriate using the fixed-effect inverse-variance method.

Results:
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed group CBT to be effective in reducing depression compared to routine primary care, usual care or waiting list groups. A pooled effect size of d = 0.57 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.80, p < 0.001) was observed at 10–13 weeks post-randomisation, reducing to d = 0.28 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.53, p = 0.025) at 6 months. The non-randomised comparisons against waiting list controls at 10–13 weeks was associated with a larger effect size of d = 0.94 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.47, p < 0.001). However due to the limitations of the available data, such as ill-specified definitions of the CBT component of the group programmes, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusions:
Although the evidence available is limited, group CBT was shown to be effective. We argue, therefore, that there is sufficient evidence to implement group CBT, conditional upon routinely collected outcomes being benchmarked against those obtained in trials of individual CBT, and with other important factors such as patient preference, clinical experience, and information from the local context taken into account when making the treatment decision.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Population, Evidence & Technologies (PET) > Warwick Evidence Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Cognitive therapy , Postpartum depression, Systematic reviews (Medical research)
Journal or Publication Title:	BMC Psychiatry
Publisher:	BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN:	1471-244X
Official Date:	2013
Dates:	Date Event 2013 Published
Date of first compliant deposit:	26 December 2015
Volume:	Volume 13
Number:	Number 1
Page Range:	Article number 321
DOI:	10.1186/1471-244X-13-321
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads