The Library
Why do crises go to waste? Fiscal austerity and public service reform
Tools
Hugh-Jones, David (2014) Why do crises go to waste? Fiscal austerity and public service reform. Public Choice, Volume 158 (Number 1-2). pp. 209-220. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-0002-5 ISSN 0048-5829.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0002-5
Abstract
In the tight budgetary conditions following the 2008 financial crisis, governments have proposed saving money by reforming public services. This paper argues that tight budget constraints make reform harder by introducing an information problem. Governments are uncertain about bureaucratic departments’ effectiveness. Normally, effective departments can be identified by increasing their budget, since they can use the increase to produce more than ineffective departments can. When budgets must be cut, however, ineffective departments can mimic effective ones by reducing their output. Budget cuts thus harm both short-run productive efficiency, and long-run allocative efficiency. I confirm these predictions in a US dataset. Low marginal productivity bureaucracies reduce output by more than expected in response to a budget cut, and budget setters respond less to observed short-run marginal productivity after cutback years.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics | ||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Public Choice | ||||
Publisher: | Springer | ||||
ISSN: | 0048-5829 | ||||
Official Date: | 2014 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Volume: | Volume 158 | ||||
Number: | Number 1-2 | ||||
Page Range: | pp. 209-220 | ||||
DOI: | 10.1007/s11127-012-0002-5 | ||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |