Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Pseudo-nonstationarity in the scaling exponents of finite-interval time series

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kiyani, K., Chapman, Sandra C. and Watkins, Nicholas W.. (2009) Pseudo-nonstationarity in the scaling exponents of finite-interval time series. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), Vol.79 (No.3). ISSN 1539-3755

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Chapman_Pseudononstationarity.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1680Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.036109

Abstract

The accurate estimation of scaling exponents is central in the observational study of scale-invariant phenomena. Natural systems unavoidably provide observations over restricted intervals; consequently, a stationary stochastic process (time series) can yield anomalous time variation in the scaling exponents, suggestive of nonstationarity. The variance in the estimates of scaling exponents computed from an interval of N observations is known for finite variance processes to vary as ~1/N as N for certain statistical estimators; however, the convergence to this behavior will depend on the details of the process, and may be slow. We study the variation in the scaling of second-order moments of the time-series increments with N for a variety of synthetic and “real world” time series, and we find that in particular for heavy tailed processes, for realizable N, one is far from this ~1/N limiting behavior. We propose a semiempirical estimate for the minimum N needed to make a meaningful estimate of the scaling exponents for model stochastic processes and compare these with some “real world” time series.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Time-series analysis, Stochastic models, Scaling laws (statistical physics)
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics)
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 1539-3755
Date: 17 March 2009
Volume: Vol.79
Number: No.3
Identification Number: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.036109
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Science and Technology Facilities Council (Great Britain) (STFC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
References: [1] U. Frisch, Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, 1995). [2] J. P. Sethna, K. A. Dahmen, and C. R. Myers, Nature 410, 242 (2001). [3] D. Sornette, Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences (Springer-Verlag, 2000). [4] S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, 2000). [5] B. Hnat, S. C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands, Physics of Plasmas 11, 1326 (2004). [6] C. W. Smith, K. Hamilton, B. J. Vasquez, and R. J. Leamon, Astrophys. J. 645, L85 (2006). [7] A. Retin`o, D. Sundkvist, A. Vaivads, F. Mozer, M. Andr´e, and C. J. Owen, Nature Physics 3, 236 (2007). [8] D. Sundkvist, A. Retin`o, A. Vaivads, and S. D. Bale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 025004 (2007). [9] L. Sorriso-Valvo, R. Marino, V. Carbone, A. Noullez, F. Lepreti, P. Veltri, R. Bruno, B. Bavassano, and E. Pietropaolo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 115001 (2007). [10] R. M. Nicol, S. C. Chapman, and R. O. Dendy, Astrophys. J. 679, 862 (2008). [11] D. Jankovicova, Z. Voros, and J. Simkanin, Nonlin. Proc. Geophys. 15, 53 (2008). [12] G. A. Abel and M. P. Freeman, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1470 (2002). [13] S. Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing (Academic Press Inc., 1999). [14] D. Popivanov and A. Mineva, Mathematical Biosciences 157, 303 (1999). [15] A. Leontitsis and C. E. Vorlow, Physica A 368, 522 (2006). [16] P. M. Robinson, Ann. Stat. 23, 1048 (1995). [17] J. Beran, Statistics for Long-Memory Processes (Chapman & Hall, 1994). [18] J. F. Muzy, E. Bacry, and A. Arneodo, Phys. Rev. E 47, 875 (1993). [19] P. Abry, P. Flandrin, M. Taqqu, and D. Veitch, Theory and applications of long-range dependence (Birkhauser, 2003), p. 527. [20] S. Stoev, V. Pipiras, and M. S. Taqqu, Signal Proc. 82, 1873 (2002). [21] J.-M. Bardet, J. Time Series Analysis 21, 497 (2000). [22] G. Samorodnitsky and M. S. Taqqu, Stable non-Gaussian random processes (Chapman & Hall, 1994). [23] S. Stoev and M. S. Taqqu, Adv. Appl. Prob. 36, 1085 (2004). [24] S. Stoev and M. S. Taqqu, Fractals 12, 95 (2004). [25] C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1424 (1987). [26] C. Meneveau, K. R. Sreenivasan, P. Kailasnath, and M. S. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 41, 894 (1990). [27] K. Kiyani, S. C. Chapman, and B. Hnat, Phys. Rev. E 74, 051122 (2006). [28] R. Weron, Physica A 312, 285 (2002). [29] C. Velasco, J. Econometrics 91, 325 (1999). [30] P. Embrechts and M. Maejima, Selfsimilar Processes (Princeton University Press, 2002). [31] T. Dudok De Wit, Phys. Rev. E 70, 055302(R) (2004). [32] F. Bardou, J. Bouchaud, A. Aspect, and C. Cohen- Tannoudji, L´evy Statistics and Laser Cooling (Cambridge University Press, 2002). [33] H. Kantz and T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1997). [34] P. Abry and D. Veitch, IEEE Trans. Inf. Th. 44, 2 (1998). [35] S. Siegert and R. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001). [36] C. Pagel and A. Balogh, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1178 (2002). [37] M. P. Freeman, N. W. Watkins, and D. J. Riley, Phys. Rev. E 62, 8794 (2000). [38] B. Hnat, S. C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands, J. Geophys. Res. 110 (2005). [39] B. Hnat, S. C. Chapman, G. Rowlands, N. W. Watkins, and W. M. Farrell, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 (2002). [40] K. Kiyani, S. C. Chapman, B. Hnat, and R. M. Nicol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 211101 (2007). [41] H. Wendt and P. Abry, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 55, 4811 (2007). [42] A. M. Zoubir and B. Boashash, IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 15, 56 (1998). [43] P. Hall, Ann. Prob. 18, 1342 (1990). [44] K. B. Athreya, Ann. Stat. 15, 724 (1987). [45] K. Knight, Ann. Stat. 17, 1168 (1989). [46] E. J. Gumbel, Statistics of Extremes (Columbia University Press, 1967). [47] R. Fox and M. S. Taqqu, Ann. Stat. 14, 517 (1986). [48] M. Vergassola and U. Frisch, Physica D 54, 58 (1991). [49] S. C. Chapman, G. Rowlands, and N. W. Watkins, Nonlin. Proc. Geophys. 9, 409 (2002).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/595

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us