Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Tort from scratch : the philosophical foundations of harm, actionability and corrective duties

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Slavny, Adam (2013) Tort from scratch : the philosophical foundations of harm, actionability and corrective duties. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Slavny_2013.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1802Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2723235~S1

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This thesis builds a normative theory of tort law by exploring the philosophical foundations
of harm, actionability and corrective duties. In chapters 1 and 2 I survey previous literature
in tort theory, arguing that normative questions have generally been neglected in favour of
interpretive ones. I also defend the case-based methodology, familiar to moral philosophers,
which I employ throughout. In chapter 3 I investigate the metaphysics of harm, making two
claims: first, we should define harm as setback to wellbeing, and second, we should accept a
complex version of the counterfactual view. In chapter 4 I distinguish between two
fundamental forms of corrective action – negating and counterbalancing – and argue that
they have important implications for tort theory. In chapter 5 I inquire whether a victim’s
false beliefs about her wellbeing should have any impact on her claim to compensation
against a wrongdoer. Chapter 6 offers a critique of George Fletcher’s theory of reciprocity as
a moral basis for corrective duties. Having rejected it, I propose a set of alternative
principles that more plausibly explains our judgement about whether an injurer ought to
compensate her victim. Finally, chapter 7 discusses the relationship between corrective and
distributive justice. I argue that, contrary to the claims of some theorists, corrective justice
cannot be insulated from distributive justice.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: K Law [LC] > K Law (General)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Torts -- Philosophy, Liability (Law), Distributive justice
Official Date: 2013
Dates:
DateEvent
2013Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: School of Law
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Not specified.
Extent: 249 pages.
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us