Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Doing jurisprudence historically : interpreting Hart through J.L. Austin

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Cole, Tony (2010) Doing jurisprudence historically : interpreting Hart through J.L. Austin. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Warwick School of Law Research Paper (Number 2010/28).

An open access version can be found in:
  • SSRN
Official URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1715178

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The article addresses the jurisprudential methodology adopted by H.L.A. in The Concept of Law. Hart himself makes very few comments in the book regarding his methodology, and this has resulted in commentators reaching conflicting views as to his approach.

The article argues that contemporary discussions of Hart have paid inadequate attention to Hart's intellectual context at the time he was developing the ideas that ultimately appeared in Concept. It then demonstrates that an appropriate attention to the work of Hart's friend and colleague J.L. Austin, can usefully illuminate certain issues regarding Hart's methodology.

The article does not, that is, argue that Concept is an "Austinian" book, but rather that there are certain aspects of Hart's methodology in Concept that can be traced to views advocated by Austin. This is demonstrated through a detailed discussion of certain elements of Austin's philosophy, combined with an illustration that these ideas can also be found in Concept and in works by Hart leading up to it. Having reached this conclusion, it is demonstrated how attributing these specific views to Hart can shed light on longstanding areas of conflict regarding Hart's methodology in Concept.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Series Name: Warwick School of Law Research Paper
Publisher: University of Warwick
Place of Publication: Coventry
Official Date: 25 November 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
25 November 2010Published
Number: Number 2010/28
Number of Pages: 63
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Open Access Version:
  • SSRN

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us