Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

British politics, the welfare state, and tort liability of public authorities

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Priel, Dan (2011) British politics, the welfare state, and tort liability of public authorities. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Warwick School of Law Research Paper (Number 2010/14).

An open access version can be found in:
  • SSRN
Official URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650547

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

There has been a notable shift in the scope of negligence liability of public authorities in the Post War period. Notably there was a trend toward restriction of liability in the 1980s. This essay tries to explain why this happened not by focusing on changing legal formulas but by examining the political context of the law in this area. I begin the essay by demonstrating how changes in the attitudes toward the role of the state have led to the changes in the law in this area. I then go on to examine the impact of Thatcher’s ascent to power. Some commentators have suggested that the restriction in liability that took place during the years of her premiership was the result of the impact of Thatcherite ideology on the courts. I consider why such an ideology might be used (and has been used) to justify restriction of liability on public authorities, but argue that such arguments are quite different from those actually found in court decisions at the time. Though founded on ideas that may also be called broadly ‘conservative’, they do not reflect the distrust of state institutions typical in New Right writings, but are rather based on great respect for them, a view that reflects a different strand of conservatism. I demonstrate this attitude from the cases and offer some explanations for its possible adoption by the courts.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Series Name: Warwick School of Law Research Paper
Journal or Publication Title: International Criminal Law Review
Publisher: University of Warwick
Place of Publication: Coventry
Official Date: 27 July 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
27 July 2011Published
Number: Number 2010/14
Number of Pages: 28
Page Range: pp. 775-802
DOI: 10.1163/157181211X587184
Institution: University of Warwick
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Open Access Version:
  • SSRN

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us