Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Long-term cost-effectiveness of weight management in primary care

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Counterweight Project Team (Including:

Trueman, P., Haynes, S. M., Lyons, G. Felicity, McCombie, E. Louise, McQuigg, M. S. A., Mongia, S., Noble, P. A., Quinn, M. F., Ross, H. M., Thompson, F. et al.
). (2010) Long-term cost-effectiveness of weight management in primary care. International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol.64 (No.6). pp. 775-783. ISSN 1368-5031

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02349.x

Abstract

Background: As obesity prevalence and health-care costs increase, Health Care providers must prevent and manage obesity cost-effectively. Methods: Using the 2006 NICE obesity health economic model, a primary care weight management programme ( Counterweight) was analysed, evaluating costs and outcomes associated with weight gain for three obesity-related conditions ( type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, colon cancer). Sensitivity analyses examined different scenarios of weight loss and background ( untreated) weight gain. Results: Mean weight changes in Counterweight attenders was -3 kg and -2.3 kg at 12 and 24 months, both 4 kg below the expected 1 kg/year background weight gain. Counterweight delivery cost was 59.83 pound per patient entered. Even assuming dropouts/non-attenders at 12 months (55%) lost no weight and gained at the background rate, Counterweight was 'dominant' (cost-saving) under 'base-case scenario', where 12-month achieved weight loss was entirely regained over the next 2 years, returning to the expected background weight gain of 1 kg/year. Quality-adjusted Life-Year cost was 2017 pound where background weight gain was limited to 0.5 kg/year, and 2651 pound at 0.3 kg/year. Under a 'best-case scenario', where weights of 12-month-attenders were assumed thereafter to rise at the background rate, 4 kg below non-intervention trajectory ( very close to the observed weight change), Counterweight remained 'dominant' with background weight gains 1 kg, 0.5 kg or 0.3 kg/year. Conclusion: Weight management for obesity in primary care is highly cost-effective even considering only three clinical consequences. Reduced healthcare resources use could offset the total cost of providing the Counterweight Programme, as well as bringing multiple health and Quality of Life benefits.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine
R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Clinical Practice
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc
ISSN: 1368-5031
Date: May 2010
Volume: Vol.64
Number: No.6
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: pp. 775-783
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02349.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/6112

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us