Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait
Wood, Alexander Mathew, 1983-, Stewart, Neil, 1974-, Joseph, Stephen and Maltby, John, 1969-. (2008) Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.44 (No.3). pp. 621-632. ISSN 0191-8869
WRAP_Stewart_Conceptulizing_gratitude.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.028
Gratitude and appreciation are currently measured using three self-report instruments, the GQ6 (1 scale), the Appreciation Scale (8 scales), and the GRAT (3 scales). Two studies were conducted to test how these three instruments are interrelated, whether they exist under the same higher order factor or factors, and whether gratitude and appreciation is a single or multi-factorial construct. In Study 1 (N = 206) all 12 scales were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. Both parallel analysis and the minimum average partial method indicated a clear one-factor solution. In Study 2 (N = 389) multigroup confirmatory factor analysis supported the one-factor structure, demonstrated the invariance of this structure across gender, and ruled out the confounding effect of socially desirable responding. We conclude gratitude and appreciation are a single-factor personality trait. We suggest integration of gratitude and appreciation literatures and provide a clearer conceptualization of gratitude.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
|Divisions:||Faculty of Science > Psychology|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Gratitude, Attitude (Psychology) -- Testing, Conduct of life, Attribution (Social psychology) -- Testing|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Personality and Individual Differences|
|Official Date:||November 2008|
|Page Range:||pp. 621-632|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||University of Warwick|
Adler and Fagley, 2005 M.G. Adler and N.S. Fagley, Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being, Journal of Personality 73 (2005), pp. 79–114.
Backstrom, 2007 M. Backstrom, Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability, European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23 (2007), pp. 63–70.
Byrne, 2004 B.M. Byrne, Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled, Structural Equation Modeling 11 (2004), pp. 272–300.
Emmons and Crumpler, 2000 R.A. Emmons and C.A. Crumpler, Gratitude as a human strength: Appraising the evidence, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 19 (2000), pp. 56–69.
Harpman, 2004 E.J. Harpman, Gratitude in the history of ideas. In: R.A. Emmons and M.E. McCullough, Editors, The psychology of gratitude, Oxford University Press, New York (2004), pp. 19–36.
Hu and Bentler, 1999 L.T. Hu and P.M. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1999), pp. 1–55.
Linley et al., 2007 P.A. Linley, J. Maltby, A.M. Wood, S. Joseph, S. Harrington and C. Peterson et al., Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA inventory of strengths, Personality and Individual Differences 43 (2007), pp. 341–351.
McCullough et al., 2002 M.E. McCullough, R.A. Emmons and J.A. Tsang, The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002), pp. 112–127.
McCullough et al., 2004 M.E. McCullough, J.-A. Tsang and R.A. Emmons, Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: Links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004), pp. 295–309.
O’Connor, 2000 B.P. O’Connor, SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test, Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers 32 (2000), pp. 396–402.
Stöber, 2001 J. Stöber, The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age, European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17 (2001), pp. 222–232.
Velicer et al., 2000 W.F. Velicer, C.A. Eaton and J.L. Fava, Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: R.D. Goffin and E. Helmes, Editors, Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas n. Jackson at seventy, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA (2000).
Watkins et al., 2006 P.C. Watkins, J. Scheer, M. Ovnicek and R. Kolts, The debt of gratitude: Dissociating gratitude and indebtedness, Cognition and Emotion 20 (2006), pp. 217–241.
Watkins et al., 2003 P.C. Watkins, K. Woodward, T. Stone and R.L. Kolts, Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being, Social Behavior and Personality 31 (2003), pp. 431–451.
Wood et al., 2007a A.M. Wood, S. Joseph and P.A. Linley, Gratitude: The parent of all virtues, The Psychologist 20 (2007), pp. 18–21.
Wood et al., 2007b A.M. Wood, S. Joseph and P.A. Linley, Coping style as a psychological resource of grateful people, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 26 (2007), pp. 1108–1125.
Zwick and Velicer, 1986 W.R. Zwick and W.F. Velicer, Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain, Psychological Bulletin 99 (1986), pp. 432–442.
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year