Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Moral responsibility and mental illness : a case study

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Broome, Matthew R., Bortolotti, Lisa and Mameli, Matteo. (2010) Moral responsibility and mental illness : a case study. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol.19 (No.2). pp. 179-187. ISSN 0963-1801

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Broome_S0963180109990442a.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (104Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180109990442

Abstract

Various authors have argued that progress in the neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric sciences might threaten the commonsense understanding of how the mind generates behavior, and, as a consequence, it might also threaten the commonsense ways of attributing moral responsibility, if not the very notion of moral responsibility. In the case of actions that result in undesirable outcomes (e.g., someone being harmed), the commonsense conception—which is reflected in sophisticated ways in the legal conception—tells us that there are circumstances in which the agent is entirely and fully responsible for the bad outcome (and deserves to be punished accordingly) and circumstances in which the agent is not at all responsible for the bad outcome (and thereby the agent does not deserve to be punished).

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Responsibility -- Case studies, Criminal liability -- Case studies, Offenders with mental disabilities -- Case studies
Journal or Publication Title: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0963-1801
Date: April 2010
Volume: Vol.19
Number: No.2
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: pp. 179-187
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0963180109990442
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Arts & Humanities Research Council (Great Britain) (AHRC)
Grant number: AH/G002606/1 (AHRC)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/6208

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us