The Library
Absolute identification by relative judgment
Tools
Stewart, Neil, 1974-, Brown, G. D. A. (Gordon D. A.) and Chater, Nick. (2005) Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, Vol.112 (No.4). pp. 881-911. ISSN 0033-295X
|
PDF
WRAP_Stewart_absolute_identification.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (528Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.881
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Psychology |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Categorization (Psychology), Decision making -- Testing, Perception -- Testing |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Psychological Review |
| Publisher: | American Psychological Association |
| ISSN: | 0033-295X |
| Date: | October 2005 |
| Volume: | Vol.112 |
| Number: | No.4 |
| Page Range: | pp. 881-911 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.881 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| Funder: | Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), European Commission (EC) |
| Grant number: | RTN-HPRN-CT-1999-00065 (EC), R000239351 (ESRC), RES-000-22-0918 (ESRC) |
| References: | 1. Alluisi, E. A. & Sidorsky, R. C. (1958). The empirical validity of equal discriminability scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 86-95. 2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebière, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 4. Ashby, F. G. & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179. 5. Bachem, A. (1954). Time factors in relative and absolute pitch determination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 751-753. 6. Baird, J. C., Romer, D. & Stein, T. (1970). Test of a cognitive theory of psychophysics: Size discrimination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30, 495-501. 7. Balakrishnan, J. D. (1997). Form and objective of the decision rule in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1049-1058. 8. Beebe-Center, J. G., Rogers, M. S. & O'Connell, D. N. (1955). Transmission of information about sucrose and saline solutions through the sense of taste. Journal of Psychology, 39, 157-160. 9. Braida, L. D. & Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483-502. 10. Braida, L. D., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., Rabinowitz, W. M. & Purks, S. R. (1984). Intensity perception: XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 722-731. 11. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002). A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification. Manuscript submitted for publication. 12. Chapanis, A. & Halsey, R. M. (1956). Absolute judgments of spectrum colors. Journal of Psychology, 42, 99-103. 13. Chater, N. & Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Scale-invariance as a unifying psychological principle. Cognition, 69, b17-b24. 14. DeCarlo, L. T. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1080-1088. 15. DeCarlo, L. T. (1994). A dynamic theory of proportional judgment: Context and judgment of length, heaviness, and roughness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 372-381. 16. DeCarlo, L. T. & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375-396. 17. Durlach, N. I. & Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372-383. 18. Efron, B. & Morris, C. (1977). Stein's paradox in statistics. Scientific American, 236, 119-127. 19. Elliott, S. W. & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Effect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 815-836. 20. Engen, T. & Pfaffmann, C. (1959). Absolute judgments of odor intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 23-26. 21. Eriksen, C. W. & Hake, H. W. (1955). Absolute judgments as a function of stimulus range and the number of stimulus and response categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 323-332. 22. Eriksen, C. W. & Hake, H. W. (1955). Multidimensional stimulus differences and accuracy of discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 153-160. 23. Eriksen, C. W. & Hake, H. W. (1957). Anchor effects in absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 132-138. 24. Estes, W. K. (1950). Towards a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107. 25. Gamer, W. R. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 373-380. 26. Gamer, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure and psychological concepts. New York: Wiley. 27. Gravetter, F. & Lockhead, G. R. (1973). Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. Psychological Review, 80, 203-216. 28. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psycho-physics. New York: Wiley. 29. Hake, H. W. & Gamer, W. R. (1951). The effect of presenting various numbers of discrete steps on scale reading accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 358-366. 30. Harris, J. D. (1952). The decline of pitch discrimination with time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 96-99. 31. Hartman, E. B. (1954). The influence of practice and pitch-distance between tones on the absolute identification of pitch. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 1-14. 32. Hawkes, G. R. & Warm, J. S. (1960). Maximum It for absolute identification of cutaneous electrical intensity level. Journal of Psychology, 49, 279-288. 33. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row. 34. Holland, M. K. & Lockhead, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409-414. 35. Hu, G. (1997). Why is it difficult to learn absolute judgment tasks. Perceptual and Motor Stills, 84, 323-335. 36. Irwin, C. C. (1937). A study of differential pitch sensitivity relative to auditory theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 642-652. 37. James, W. & Stein, C. (1961). Estimation with quadratic loss. Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 361-379. 38. Jesteadt, W., Luce, R. D. & Green, D. M. (1977). Sequential effects of the judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 92-104. 39. Karpiuk, P., Lacouture, Y., & Marley, A. A. J. (1997). A limited capacity, wave equality, random walk model of absolute identification. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 279-299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 40. Kent, C. & Lamberts, L. (2005). An exemplar account of the bow and set-size effects in absolute identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 289-305. 41. Kinchla, R. A. & Smyzer, F. (1967). A diffusion model of perceptual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 219-229. 42. König, E. (1957). Effect of time on pitch discrimination thresholds under several psychophysical procedures: Comparison with intensity discrimination thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 606-612. 43. Lacouture, Y. (1997). Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response-time analysis. Psychological Research, 60, 121-133. 44. Lacouture, Y. & Marley, A. A. J. (1991). A connectionist model of choice and reaction time in absolute identification. Connection Science, 3, 401-433. 45. Lacouture, Y. & Marley, A. A. J. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 383-395. 46. Lacouture, Y. & Marley, A. A. J. (2004). Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1206-1226. 47. Lacouture, Y., Li, S. C. & Marley, A. A. J. (1998). The roles of stimulus and response set size in the identification and categorisation of unidimensional stimuli. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 165-174. 48. Lamberts, K. (2000). Information -accumulation theory of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 107, 227-260. 49. Laming, D. R. J. (1984). The relativity of "absolute" judgements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 152-183. 50. Laming, D. R. J. (1997). The measurement of sensation. London: Oxford University Press. 51. Lockhead, G. R. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 27-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 52. Lockhead, G. R. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 543-601. 53. Lockhead, G. R. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. Review of General Psychology, 8, 265-272. 54. Lockhead, G. R. & Hinson, J. (1986). Range and sequence effects in judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 53-61. 55. Lockhead, G. R. & King, M. C. (1983). A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 461-473. 56. Long, L. (1937). A study of the effect of preceding stimuli upon the judgment of auditory intensities. Archives of Psychology (New York), 30, 209. 57. Luce, R. D. & Green, D. M. (1974). The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 11, 1-14. 58. Luce, R. D., Green, D. M. & Weber, D. L. (1976). Attention bands in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 49-54. 59. Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D. M. & Smith, A. F. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 397-408. 60. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Aslaken, P. M. & Kildebo, O. O. (2003). High-fidelity perceptual long-term memory revisited-and confirmed. Psychological Science, 14, 74-76. 61. Marley, A. A. J. (1976). A revision of the response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 252-254. 62. Marley, A. A. J. & Cook, V. T. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 136-151. 63. Marley, A. A. J. & Cook, V. T. (1986). A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychological judgments applied to magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 339-390. 64. Massaro, D. W. (1970). Retroactive interference in short-term memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 32-39. 65. McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19, 97-116. 66. McGill, W. J. (1957). Serial effects in auditory threshold judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 297-303. 67. Medin, D. L. & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238. 68. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. 69. Mori, S. (1998). Effects of stimulus information and number of stimuli on the sequential dependencies in absolute identification. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 72-83. 70. Mori, S. & Ward, L. M. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1065-1079. 71. Murdock, B. B. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16-31. 72. Norwich, K. H., Wong, W. & Sagi, E. (1998). Range as a factor in determining the information of loudness judgments: Overcoming small sample bias. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 63-70. 73. Nosofsky, R. M. (1983). Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise in absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 299-309. 74. Nosofsky, R. M. (1983). Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 103-112. 75. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification -categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57. 76. Nosofsky, R. M. (1997). An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded categorization and absolute judgment. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement (pp. 347-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 77. Nosofsky, R. M. & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300. 78. Petrov, A. A. & Anderson, J. R. (2005). The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. Psychological Review, 112, 383-416. 79. Petzold, P. & Haubensak, G. (2001). Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 969-978. 80. Pollack, I. (1952). The information of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 745-749. 81. Pollack, I. (1953). The information of elementary auditory displays: II. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 765-769. 82. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press. 83. Purks, S. R., Callahan, D. J., Braida, L. D. & Durlach, N. I. (1980). Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 634-637. 84. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Cowan, N. & Pfaltz, M. (2004). Learning in a unidimensional absolute identification task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 938-944. 85. Shiffrin, R. M. & Nosofsky, R. M. (1994). Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations. Psychological Review, 101, 357-361. 86. Siegel, J. A. & Siegel, W. (1972). Absolute judgment and paired-associate learning: Kissing cousins or identical twins. Psychological Review, 79, 300-316. 87. Siegel, W. (1972). Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 121-131. 88. Staddon, J. E. R., King, M. & Lockhead, G. R. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 290-301. 89. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley. 90. Stewart, N. (2001). Perceptual categorization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. 91. Stewart, N. & Brown, G. D. A. (2004). Sequence effects in categorizing tones varying in frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 416-430. 92. Stewart, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Similarity and dissimilarity as evidence in perceptual categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 93. Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2003). No unified scales for perceptual magnitudes: Evidence from loudness. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved August 2005, from http://www.Warwick .ac.uk/staff/Neil .Stewart/papers /Stewart_Chater _2003.pdf 94. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A. & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 3-11. 95. Tanner, W. P., Jr. (1961). Physiological implications of psychological data. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 89, 752-765. 96. Treisman, M. (1985). The magical number seven and some other features of category scaling: Properties for a model of absolute judgment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 175-230. 97. Treisman, M. & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111. 98. Usher, M. & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. 99. Ward, L. M. (1987). Remembrance of sounds past: Memory and psycho-physical scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 216-227. 100. Ward, L. M. & Lockhead, G. R. (1970). Sequential effect and memory in category judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 27-34. 101. Ward, L. M. & Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 73-78. 102. Weber, D. L., Green, D. M. & Luce, R. D. (1977). Effect of practice and distribution of auditory signals on absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 223-231. 103. Wickelgren, W. A. (1966). Consolidation and retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 250-259. 104. Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Associative strength theory of recognition memory for pitch. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 13-61. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/622 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

