The Library

Implementing a 48 h EWTD-compliant rota for junior doctors in the UK does not compromise patients’ safety : assessor-blind pilot comparison

Tools

Cappuccio, Francesco, Bakewell, A., Taggart, Frances M., Ward, G., Ji, Chen, Sullivan, J.P., Edmunds, M., Pounder, R., Landrigan, C. P., Lockley, S. W. and Peile, Ed. (2009) Implementing a 48 h EWTD-compliant rota for junior doctors in the UK does not compromise patients’ safety : assessor-blind pilot comparison. QJM, Vol.102 (No.4). pp. 271-282. ISSN 1460-2725

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Cappuccio_Implementing.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (227Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp004

Abstract

Background: There are currently no field data about the effect of implementing European Working Time Directive (EWTD)-compliant rotas in a medical setting. Surveys of doctors’ subjective opinions on shift work have not provided reliable objective data with which to evaluate its efficacy.

Aim: We therefore studied the effects on patient's safety and doctors’ work-sleep patterns of implementing an EWTD-compliant 48 h work week in a single-blind intervention study carried out over a 12-week period at the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust. We hypothesized that medical error rates would be reduced following the new rota.

Methods: Nineteen junior doctors, nine studied while working an intervention schedule of <48 h per week and 10 studied while working traditional weeks of <56 h scheduled hours in medical wards. Work hours and sleep duration were recorded daily. Rate of medical errors (per 1000 patient-days), identified using an established active surveillance methodology, were compared for the Intervention and Traditional wards. Two senior physicians blinded to rota independently rated all suspected errors.

Results: Average scheduled work hours were significantly lower on the intervention schedule [43.2 (SD 7.7) (range 26.0–60.0) vs. 52.4 (11.2) (30.0–77.0) h/week; P < 0.001], and there was a non-significant trend for increased total sleep time per day [7.26 (0.36) vs. 6.75 (0.40) h; P = 0.095]. During a total of 4782 patient-days involving 481 admissions, 32.7% fewer total medical errors occurred during the intervention than during the traditional rota (27.6 vs. 41.0 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.006), including 82.6% fewer intercepted potential adverse events (1.2 vs. 6.9 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.002) and 31.4% fewer non-intercepted potential adverse events (16.6 vs. 24.2 per 1000 patient-days, P = 0.067). Doctors reported worse educational opportunities on the intervention rota.

Conclusions: Whilst concerns remain regarding reduced educational opportunities, our study supports the hypothesis that a 48 h work week coupled with targeted efforts to improve sleep hygiene improves patient safety.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

R Medicine > R Medicine (General)

Divisions:

Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Biomedical Sciences > Translational & Experimental Medicine > Metabolic and Vascular Health (- until July 2016)
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Physicians -- Great Britain, Physicians -- Health and hygiene, Hours of labor -- Law and legislation -- Europe

Journal or Publication Title:

QJM

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

ISSN:

1460-2725

Official Date:

27 January 2009

Dates:

Date	Event
27 January 2009	Published

Volume:

Vol.102

Number:

No.4

Page Range:

pp. 271-282

Identification Number:

10.1093/qjmed/hcp004

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Great Britain. National Health Service (NHS)

References:

1. Jaeger vs. Landeshauptstadt Kiel. Social Policy – Council Directive 93/1 04/EC – Concepts of working time and rest period – On-call service provided by doctors in hospitals. (2003).
2. NHS Management Executive. Hours of Work of Doctors in Training, NHS Management Executive. (1991).
3. British Medical Association. (accessed 8th April 2008). http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/NIEWTD.
4. Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Burdick E, Katz JT, et al. Effect of reducing intern's work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. New Engl J Med (2004) 351:1838–48.
5. Barger LK, Ayas NT, Cade BE, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Czeisler CA. Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. Plos Med (2006) 3:e487.
6. Lockley SW, Cronin JW, Evans EE, Cade BE, Lee CJ, Landrigan CP, et al. Effect of reducing interns’ weekly work hours on sleep and attentional failures. New Engl J Med (2004) 351:1829–37.
7. Folkard S, Tucker P. Shift work, safety and productivity. Occup Med (2003) 53:95–101.
8. Folkard S, Lombardi DA, Tucker PT. Shift work: safety, sleepiness and sleep. Industrial Health (2005) 43:20–3.
9. Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, et al. Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns. New Engl J Med (2005) 352:125–34.
10. Ayas NT, Barger LK, Cade BE, Hashimoto DM, Rosner B, Cronin JW, et al. Extended work duration and the risk of self-reported percutaneous injuries in interns. JAMA (2006) 296:1055–62.
11. Paice E, Reid W. Can training and service survive the European Working Time Directive? Med Educ (2004) 38:336–339.
12. Horrocks N, Pounder R, on behalf of the Multidisciplinary Working Group of the Royal College of Physicians. Designing Safer Rotas for Junior Doctors in the 48-Hour Week (2006) London: Royal College of Physicians. 1–23.
13. Aitken M, Paice E. Trainees’ attitudes to shift work depend on grade and specialty. Br Med J (2003) 326:48.
14. Lockley SW, Landrigan CP, Barger LK, Czeisler CA. When policy meets physiology. The challenge of reducing resident work hours. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 449:116–27.
15. Pounder R. European junior doctors who work at night. Eurohealth (2006) 12:5–7.
16. Horrocks N, Pounder R. Who's for five nine-hour shifts a week? Clin Med (2006) 6:440–2.
17. Fahrenkopf AM, Sectish TC, Barger LK, Sharek PJ, Lewin D, Chiang VW, et al. Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. Br Med J (2008) 336:488–91.
18. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA (1995) 274:29–34.
19. Walsh KE, Adams WG, Bauchner H, Vinci RJ, Chessare JB, Cooper MR, et al. Medication errors related to computer order entry in children. Pediatrics (2006) 118:1872–79.
20. Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events. In: IHI Innovation Series White Paper (2007) Cambridge, Massachussetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
21. Tamuz M, Thomas EJ, Franchois KE. Defining and classifying medical error: lessons from patient safety reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care (2004) 13:13–20.
22. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J (2000) 320:768–70.
23. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) London: Sage.
24. Lydall G, Malik A, Bhugra D. Mental health of applicants seems to be deteriorating. Br Med J (2007) 334:1335.
25. Murray A, Pounder R, Mather H, Black C. Junior doctors’ shifts and sleep deprivation. Br Med J (2005) 330:1404.
26. Ahmed-Little Y. Implications of shift work for junior doctors. Br Med J (2007) 334:777.
27. Benger J. Not just about working hours. Br Med J (2008) 336:345.
28. Pounder R. Junior doctors’ working hours: can 56 go into 48? Clin Med (2008) 8:126–7.
29. Gander PH, Purnell HM, Garden A, Woodward A. Work patterns and fatigue-related risk among junior doctors. Occup Environ Med (2007) 64:733–8.
30. Kara N, Patil PV, Shimi SM. Changes in working patterns hit emergency general surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl (2008) 90(Suppl):60–3.
31. Grover K, Gatt M, MacFie J. The effect of the EWTD on surgical SpRs: a regional survey. Ann R Coll SurgEngl (2008) 90(Suppl):68–70.
32. Health Policy & Economic Research Unit. BMA survey of junior doctors’ views on working hours and the European Working Time Directive. (2008) March. London: British Medical Association. 1–27.
33. Horrocks N, Pounder R. Working the night shift: preparation, survival and recovery – a guide for junior doctors. Clin Med (2006) 6:61–7.
34. Czeisler CA, Moore-Ede MC, Coleman RM. Rotating shift work schedules that disrupt sleep are improved by applying circadian principles. Science (1982) 217:460–3.
35. Czeisler CA, Duffy JF, Shanahan TL, Brown EN, Mitchell JF, Rimmer DW, et al. Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. Science (1999) 284:2177–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Santhi N, Horowitz TS, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Acute sleep deprivation and circadian misalignment associated with transition onto the first night of work impairs visual selective attention. PLoS One (2007) 2:e1233.ctor. Br Med J (2008) 336:218.
38. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common Programme Requirements for Residents Duty Hours. (Accessed 15 April 2008). http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/dutyHours/dhComProgrRequirmentsDutyHours0707.pdf.
39. Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O'Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH. Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med (1994) 121:866–72.
40. Petersen LA, Orav EJ, Teich JM, O'Neil AC. Using a computerized sign-out program to improve continuity of inpatient care and prevent adverse events. Joint Commission J Qual Impr (1998) 24:77–87.
41. Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Rossini AJ, Pellegrini CA. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. J Am Coll Surg (2005) 200:538–45.
42. Weingart SN, Wilson RMcL, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology of medical error. Br Med J (2000) 320:774–7.
43. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Event Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospitals patients in Canada. CMAJ (2004) 170:1678–86.
44. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshymowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. Br Med J (2001) 322:517–9.
45. Woloshynowych M, Neale G, Vincent C. Case record review of adverse events: a new approach. Qual Saf Health Care (2003) 12:411–5.
46. Stickgold R. Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Nature (2005) 437:1272–8.
47. Van Dongen HP, Maislin G, Mullington JM, Dinges DF. The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep (2003) 26:117–26.
48. Arnedt JT, Owens J, Crouch M, Stahl J, Carskadon MA. Neurobehavioral performance of residents after heavy night call vs after alcohol ingestion. JAMA (2005) 294:1025–33.
49. Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based policy making. Br Med J (2004) 329:988–9.

URI:

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/624

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record