Guallar, Eliseo, Miller III, Edgar R., Ordovas, J. M. and Stranges, Saverio (2010) Vitamin D supplementation in the age of lost innocence. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol.152 (No.5). pp. 327-329. ISSN 0003-4819

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Recently, we have witnessed an explosion of scientific and media attention to the health effects of vitamin D status and vitamin D supplementation (1). Vitamin D 3 (cholecalciferol), the most powerful form of vitamin D, is synthesized in the skin from 7-dehydrocholesterol by action of sunlight (ultraviolet B radiation) (2). Vitamin D is biologically inert and must be converted to the active hormone 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] (calcitriol). Vitamin D's pivotal role in regulating calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism has been long recognized (2–4); however, mounting evidence suggests that vitamin D may also influence various nonskeletal medical conditions, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disorders, and overall mortality (5–8). Indeed, claims that large segments of the population have inadequate vitamin D concentrations have prompted calls to increase vitamin D intake through supplementation or fortification (9, 10). The claims of wide-ranging health benefits from increased vitamin D intake follow decades of research that led to the collapse of similar claims regarding antioxidant vitamins and folic acid supplementation (11–13). In addition, randomized, controlled clinical trials showed increased all-cause mortality with high-dose β-carotene and vitamin E supplements, 2 antioxidant vitamins that were widely believed to be safe (11, 14). Will history repeat itself, or will widespread vitamin D supplementation overcome a real nutritional deficiency? Two systematic reviews in this issue (15, 16) summarize the role of vitamin D in cardiovascular disease and provide insight into the type of evidence that is necessary to fully understand the effects of vitamin D. Pittas and colleagues (15) reviewed the prospective observational studies on the association between vitamin D status, assessed by 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration in blood or reported vitamin D intake, and incident cardiometabolic outcomes. For clinical cardiovascular outcomes, 4 of 7 analyses (originating from …

Item Type:	Journal Item
Subjects:	Q Science > QP Physiology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Vitamin D in the body, Vitamin D deficiency, Dietary supplements
Journal or Publication Title:	Annals of Internal Medicine
Publisher:	American College of Physicians
ISSN:	0003-4819
Date:	2 March 2010
Volume:	Vol.152
Number:	No.5
Number of Pages:	4
Page Range:	pp. 327-329
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/6286

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item