Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Azathioprine treatment photosensitizes human skin to ultraviolet A radiation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Perrett, C. M., Walker, S.L., O’Donovan, P., Warwick, Jane, Harwood, C. A., Karran, P. and McGregor, J. M. (2008) Azathioprine treatment photosensitizes human skin to ultraviolet A radiation. British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 159 (Number 1). pp. 198-204. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08610.x

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08610.x

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background: Evidence of the impact of breast screening is limited by biases inherent in non-randomised studies and often by lack of complete population data. We address this by estimating the effect of screen detection on cause-specific fatality in breast cancer, corrected for all potential biases, using population cancer registry data.
Methods: Subjects (N = 26,766) comprised all breast cancers notified to the West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit and diagnosed in women aged 50–74, from 1988 to 2004. These included 10,100 screen-detected and 15,862 symptomatic breast cancers (6,009 women with interval cancers and 9,853 who had not attended screening). Our endpoint was survival to death from breast cancer. We estimated the relative risk (RR) of 10-year cause-specific fatality (screen-detected compared to symptomatic cancers) correcting for lead time bias and performing sensitivity analyses for length bias. To exclude self-selection bias, survival analyses were also performed with interval cancers as the comparator symptomatic women. Findings: Uncorrected RR associated with screen-detection was 0.34 (95% CI 0.31–0.37). Correcting for lead time, RR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.45–0.53); length bias analyses gave a range of RR corrected for both phenomena of 0.49–0.59, with a median of 0.51. Self-selection bias-corrected estimates yielded a median RR of 0.68.
Interpretation: After adjusting for various potential biases, women with screen-detected breast cancer have a substantial survival advantage over those with symptomatic breast cancer.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of Dermatology
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0007-0963
Official Date: July 2008
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2008Published
Volume: Volume 159
Number: Number 1
Page Range: pp. 198-204
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08610.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us