The Library
Spatial variability in microclimate in a mixed-conifer forest before and after thinning and burning treatments
Tools
Tools
Tools
Ma, Siyan, Concilio, Amy, Oakley, Brian B., North, Malcolm and Chen, Jiquan (2010) Spatial variability in microclimate in a mixed-conifer forest before and after thinning and burning treatments. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol.259 (No.5). pp. 904-915. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.030
Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.030
Abstract
In the western United States, mechanical thinning and prescribed fire are common forest management practices aimed at reducing potential wildfire severity and restoring historic forest structure, yet their effects on forest microclimate conditions are not well understood. We collected microclimate data between 1998 and 2003 in a mixed-conifer forest in California's Sierra Nevada. Air and soil temperatures, relative humidity, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), wind speed, soil heat flux, and soil volumetric moisture were measured at the center of 18 four-ha plots. Each plot was assigned one of six combinations of thinning and burning treatments, and each treatment was thus given three replications. We found that spatial variability in microclimate, quantified as standard deviations among monthly values of each microclimatic variable across different locations (n <= 18), was significantly high and was influenced primarily by elevation and canopy cover. The combination of thinning and burning treatments increased air temperature from 58.1% to 123.6%. Soil temperatures increased in all thinned plots. Air moisture variables indicated that treatments made air drier, but soil moisture increased in the range 7.9-39.8%, regardless of treatment type. PAR increased in the range 50.4-254.8%, depending on treatment type. Treatments combining thinning and burning increased wind speed by 15.3-194.3%. Although soil heat flux increased dramatically in magnitude in some plots, overall treatment effects on G were not statistically significant. We discussed the significance and implications of the spatial variability of microclimate and the treatment effects to various ecological processes and to forest management. Published by Elsevier B.V.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | S Agriculture > SD Forestry | ||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010) | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Forest Ecology and Management | ||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier Science BV | ||||
| ISSN: | 0378-1127 | ||||
| Official Date: | 20 February 2010 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Volume: | Vol.259 | ||||
| Number: | No.5 | ||||
| Number of Pages: | 12 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 904-915 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.030 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||
| Funder: | USDA of the Pacific Southwest Research Station, Graduate Schools of Michigan Technological University, University of Toledo, and McIntire-Stennis funds at Michigan Technological University | ||||
| Grant number: | PSW-98-011-RJVA-AMD |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
