Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Where next for pupils excluded from special schools and pupil referral units?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Pirrie, Anne, Macleod, Gale, Cullen, Mairi Ann and McCluskey, Gillean (2009) Where next for pupils excluded from special schools and pupil referral units? London : Department for Children, Schools and Families. (Research Report Number DCSF-RR163 ).

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This study of routes, destinations and outcomes for pupils permanently excluded from
special schools and Pupil Referral Units (PRUs) was commissioned in the autumn of 2006 in
the light of concerns expressed in the report of the Practitioners’ Group on School Behaviour
and Discipline [The Steer Report]. These related to the quality of educational provision for
young people with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties (BESD)1
(DfES, 2005a, p. 9).
The Steer Report recognised that ‘there are occasions when it is necessary to exclude pupils
from a PRU or a BESD special school (including residential schools)’ and expressed concern
about ‘what alternative forms of education are available for these most vulnerable pupils,
particularly in smaller authorities that may only have one PRU’ (DfES, 2005a, p. 57).
The policy context in which the research was conducted is complex, and comprises four
discrete but closely inter-related policy strands, namely: Every Child Matters: Change for
Children and the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity
Services; the Respect Action Plan; the Reaching Out policy suite; and The Children’s Plan.
Building Brighter Futures and the ensuing White Paper Back on Track. The latter, a strategy
for modernising alternative provision for young people, is of particular relevance to this study.
These four main policy strands are the immediate context in which the research was
conducted. Other more specific policy is outlined in the Final Report.

Item Type: Report
Alternative Title:
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR)
Series Name: Research Report Number DCSF-RR163
Publisher: Department for Children, Schools and Families
Place of Publication: London
ISBN: 9781847755377
Official Date: September 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2009Published
Number of Pages: 95
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us