The Library
Molecular tools for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis : systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
Tools
Tools
Tools
de Ruiter, C. M., van der Veer, C., Leeflang, M. M. G., Deborggraeve, S., Lucas, C. and Adams, E. R. (2014) Molecular tools for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis : systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Volume 52 (Number 9). pp. 3147-3155. doi:10.1128/JCM.00372-14
An open access version can be found in:
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00372-14
Abstract
Molecular methods have been proposed as highly sensitive tools for the detection of Leishmania parasites in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients. Here, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these tools in a meta-analysis of the published literature. The selection criteria were original studies that evaluate the sensitivities and specificities of molecular tests for diagnosis of VL, adequate classification of study participants, and the absolute numbers of true positives and negatives derivable from the data presented. Forty studies met the selection criteria, including PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). The sensitivities of the individual studies ranged from 29 to 100%, and the specificities ranged from 25 to 100%. The pooled sensitivity of PCR in whole blood was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0 to 95.2), and the specificity was 95.6% (95% CI, 87.0 to 98.6). The specificity was significantly lower in consecutive studies, at 63.3% (95% CI, 53.9 to 71.8), due either to true-positive patients not being identified by parasitological methods or to the number of asymptomatic carriers in areas of endemicity. PCR for patients with HIV-VL coinfection showed high diagnostic accuracy in buffy coat and bone marrow, ranging from 93.1 to 96.9%. Molecular tools are highly sensitive assays for Leishmania detection and may contribute as an additional test in the algorithm, together with a clear clinical case definition. We observed wide variety in reference standards and study designs and now recommend consecutively designed studies.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Biomedical Sciences > Microbiology & Infection Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology | ||||||||||
| Publisher: | American Society of Microbiology | ||||||||||
| ISSN: | 0095-1137 | ||||||||||
| Official Date: | September 2014 | ||||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||||
| Volume: | Volume 52 | ||||||||||
| Number: | Number 9 | ||||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 3147-3155 | ||||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1128/JCM.00372-14 | ||||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||||
| Open Access Version: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
