Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Review of Paradox, aphorism and desire in Novalis and Derrida, by Kennedy, C.

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hodkinson, James R. (2010) Review of Paradox, aphorism and desire in Novalis and Derrida, by Kennedy, C. Modern Language Review, Vol.105 (No.1). pp. 206-208. ISSN 0026-7937

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25655150

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The 1980s saw a trend in Novalis scholarship towards equating the poet’s thought and writing with post-structuralism: Novalis’s criticism of absolutist metaphysics
and his notion of identity as a linguistic construct seemed to resonate with contemporary concerns. By the 1990s others, such as John Neubauer (‘Novalis und der Postmodernismus’, in Geschichtlichkeit und Aktualität, ed. by K. Müller, G. Pasternack, W. Segebrecht, and L. Stockinger (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1988), pp. 207-20) and Herbert Uerlings (Friedrich von Hardenberg, genannt Novalis: Werk und Forschung (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1991)), had sounded cautionary notes:
while Novalis’s texts demonstrated deconstructing impulses, they rested nevertheless upon the existence of a metaphysical absolute which, although often radically
ironized, threatened to reassert its presence. Thus the poet was left inhabiting a field of tension between idealism and a kind of anticipated post-structuralism. Any critic reopening this debate today has to tread carefully, seeking nuanced points of congruence between Romanticism and post-structuralism, rather than simple equations. Clare Kennedy’s monograph attempts just this, seeing the necessity for ‘reading Novalis responsibly with Derrida’ (p. 8). This, then, is to be a more sustained discussion of the similarities between the writing of the late French philosopher and Novalis than has been attempted hitherto, one which will demonstrate how the ‘resemblances between the two writers are, at times, uncanny’ (p. 8).

Item Type: Book Review
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > School of Modern Languages and Cultures > German Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Novalis, 1772-1801 -- Criticism and interpretation, Derrida, Jacques -- Criticism and interpretation, Paradox in literature, Desire in literature, Aphorisms and apothegms in literature
Journal or Publication Title: Modern Language Review
Publisher: Maney Publishing
ISSN: 0026-7937
Book Title: Paradox, aphorism and desire in Novalis and Derrida
Official Date: 1 January 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
1 January 2010Published
Volume: Vol.105
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 3
Page Range: pp. 206-208
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us