Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Comparative theory, China, and the future of East Asian regionalism(s)

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Breslin, Shaun. (2010) Comparative theory, China, and the future of East Asian regionalism(s). Review of International Studies, Vol.36 (No.3). pp. 709-729. ISSN 0260-2105

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Breslin_breslin_regionalism_for_RIS.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (250Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000665

Abstract

Despite the development of an increasingly sophisticated literature on comparative regional integration drawing from a variety of cases, the European experience remains the most often used benchmark against which other integrative processes are judged; there is still an often implicit expectation that 'successful' processes of regionalism will end up looking something like the European Union. While it is correct to move away from such a 'Euro-dominance', the theoretical lessons learned continue to have salience when applied to emerging and competing forms of integrative processes in East Asia. in particular, when economic considerations dominate regional relations at times of economic crises then integrative logics and strategies come to the fore. In more 'normal' times when geo-strategic considerations reassert themselves, then the consensus over region building and the very nature of the region itself is weakened and cooperation is replaced by competing visions and the over-supply of region.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
D History General and Old World > DS Asia
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Regionalism -- East Asia, International relations -- Interpretation and construction, East Asia -- Administrative and political divisions, East Asia -- Politics and government, East Asia -- Economic conditions
Journal or Publication Title: Review of International Studies
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0260-2105
Date: July 2010
Volume: Vol.36
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 21
Page Range: pp. 709-729
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0260210510000665
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/645

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us