The Library
Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences
Tools
Tools
Tools
Wonnacott, Elizabeth, Joseph, Holly S. S. L., Adelman, James S. and Nation, Kate (2015) Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69 (5). pp. 855-879. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176
Abstract
We monitored 8- and 10-year-old children's eye movements as they read sentences containing a temporary syntactic ambiguity to obtain a detailed record of their online processing. Children showed the classic garden-path effect in online processing. Their reading was disrupted following disambiguation, relative to control sentences containing a comma to block the ambiguity, although the disruption occurred somewhat later than would be expected for mature readers. We also asked children questions to probe their comprehension of the syntactic ambiguity offline. They made more errors following ambiguous sentences than following control sentences, demonstrating that the initial incorrect parse of the garden-path sentence influenced offline comprehension. These findings are consistent with “good enough” processing effects seen in adults. While faster reading times and more regressions were generally associated with better comprehension, spending longer reading the question predicted comprehension success specifically in the ambiguous condition. This suggests that reading the question prompted children to reconstruct the sentence and engage in some form of processing, which in turn increased the likelihood of comprehension success. Older children were more sensitive to the syntactic function of commas, and, overall, they were faster and more accurate than younger children.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | ||||||
| Publisher: | Sage Publications Ltd. | ||||||
| Official Date: | 1 May 2015 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Volume: | 69 | ||||||
| Number: | 5 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 855-879 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
