Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Welfare to work, wages and wage growth

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2005) Welfare to work, wages and wage growth. FISCAL STUDIES, 26 (3). pp. 335-370. ISSN 0143-5671

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper attempts to uncover the effects of a UK welfare-to-work programme on individual wage growth by exploiting an expansion to this welfare programme. The conventional wisdom is that such programmes trap recipients into low-wage, low-quality work - this comes from the simple argument that the 'poverty trap', which a wage subsidy for low-income workers induces, reduces the benefits to investments, such as on-the-job training, and so reduces wage growth. In fact, a wage subsidy will also reduce the costs of, at least, general training because we would normally expect workers to pay for their own general training in the form of lower gross wages. So a wage subsidy is a way of sharing these costs with the taxpayer. Thus, the net effect on wage progression depends on whether it reduces costs by more or less than it reduces the benefits. The paper uses Labour Force Survey panel data to look at wage growth in the UK before and after working families' tax credit (WFTC) replaced family credit (FC). We exploit non-linearities in the programme and, overall, we find that wage growth for those on WFTC exceeded wage growth for those on FC. This is particularly the case for individuals receiving the maximum amount of the credit in both the FC and WFTC periods.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Journal or Publication Title: FISCAL STUDIES
Publisher: BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
ISSN: 0143-5671
Date: September 2005
Volume: 26
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 36
Page Range: pp. 335-370
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/6622

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us