The Library
Patient recruitment in a challenging surgical trial : issues and possible solutions
Tools
Kulikov, Yuri (2014) Patient recruitment in a challenging surgical trial : issues and possible solutions. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
|
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Kulikov_2014.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (4Mb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2752349~S1
Abstract
Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are regarded as a ‘gold standard’ technique to evaluate and compare clinical interventions. Strict ethical criteria dictate the participation of humans in clinical research, based on informed consent, voluntary decision making and putting patients’ interests first.
Demand for RCTs in Trauma and Orthopaedics is high, but patient recruitment continues to pose a significant challenge, especially when the treatments being compared are obviously different. Lack of blinding, treatment preference and negative perception of random allocation to interventions are among the obstacles which need to be considered.
Based on review and analysis of current knowledge, an attempt is made to develop a new recruitment process that incorporates high ethical standards and provision of the best possible clinical care for an individual patient. By integrating the principle of clinical equipoise, modern technology and statistical concepts, such as subjective probability, the Patient Eligibility Assessment through Clinical Equipoise (PEACE) framework has been introduced. This provides an alternative that could be used in trials where the fixed eligibility criteria approach is likely to fail. It was tested involving 77 real clinical cases from a national multi-centre trauma RCT, which compared contrasting treatments.
A new trial recruitment approach aiming to avoid direct contact between a patient and a treating clinician was rolled out in the same trial. The feedback was collected from both the clinicians and the patients involved. Thematic analysis of 23 semi-structured interviews improved understanding of the various factors influencing patients’ decision about trial participation. Further typological analysis provided a valuable insight into the different attitudes that patients adopted when faced with the dilemma. In particular, that many are positive towards research involvement, but not comfortable with randomisation based on fixed eligibility criteria.
According to these results, a new model for patient recruitment is suggested, which could be researched and tested in future trials.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) | ||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Clinical trials | ||||
Official Date: | October 2014 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Warwick Medical School | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Adams, Ann ; Parsons, Nicholas R. ; Griffin, Damian R. | ||||
Extent: | 243 pages : charts | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year