The Library
Auditor mergers, audit quality and audit fees : evidence from the PricewaterhouseCoopers merger in the UK
Tools
Tools
Tools
Ding, Rong and Jia, Yuping (2012) Auditor mergers, audit quality and audit fees : evidence from the PricewaterhouseCoopers merger in the UK. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31 (1). pp. 69-85. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.002
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.002
Abstract
Focusing on the merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand in 1998, we document increased audit quality (measured by earnings quality of the clients) for the merged firm and other big-X auditors (The big-X auditors are Ernst & Young, Deloitte, KPMG and Arthur Anderson.) during the post-merger period because: (1) controlling for economic conditions, clients of big-X auditors have lower levels of absolute discretionary accruals and (2) the value relevance of earnings has significantly increased. Furthermore, we find evidence that in the post-merger period, there is a significant increase in audit fees for PricewaterhouseCoopers and other big-X client firms, which suggests that the effect of collectively enhanced market power of big-X auditors (which tends to increase audit fees) dominates the effect of cost savings from the merger (which tends to lower audit fees). The results have implications for regulators and policy makers.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Accounting Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School |
||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Accounting and Public Policy | ||||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. | ||||||
| ISSN: | 0278-4254 | ||||||
| Official Date: | January 2012 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Volume: | 31 | ||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||
| Number of Pages: | 16 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 69-85 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.002 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
