Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Making people criminal : the role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Aliverti, Ana J. (2012) Making people criminal : the role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement. Theoretical Criminology, Volume 16 (Number 4). pp. 417-434. doi:10.1177/1362480612449779

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480612449779

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article analyses the recent expansion of immigration offences in Britain. Drawing on criminal law scholarship, it considers the reasons for relying on the criminal law in immigration enforcement. On the one hand, criminal law is used symbolically. In this view, the creation of criminal offences may be read as an attempt to appease a sector of the electorate, the media and the Opposition about the ‘immigration problem.’ By introducing these offences, the government sent a message that the situation is under control. On the other hand, the criminal law serves regulatory functions, offering the UK Border Agency a range of options for dealing with unwanted immigrants. In practice, most immigration offences are rarely enforced. Instead, the criminal law often seems to primarily work as a threat, relied on to enforce compliance with immigration rules. A criminal prosecution is reserved for those foreigners for whom the primary sanction –expulsion- cannot be carried out. In these cases, a criminal prosecution and conviction facilitate administrative proceedings leading to removal. Given that the criminalization of immigration breaches is in stark contrast with a number of criminal law principles, this paper argues that the normative justification of criminal law in immigration matters is weak and it should have no role to play in the enforcement of immigration rules.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: K Law [LC] > KD England and Wales
K Law [LC] > KD England and Wales > KDC Scotland
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Emigration and immigration -- Law and legislation, Immigrants -- Legal status, laws, etc, Criminal law -- Great Britain, Deportation
Journal or Publication Title: Theoretical Criminology
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd
ISSN: 1362-4806
Official Date: November 2012
Dates:
DateEvent
November 2012Published
13 July 2013Available
Volume: Volume 16
Number: Number 4
Page Range: pp. 417-434
DOI: 10.1177/1362480612449779
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description:

Winner of the Theoretical Criminology Article Award 2012

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us