The Library
Exam success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools : is learning style or learning approach more important? : A critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry (“traditional”) and graduate-entry (“nontraditional”) medical students
Tools
Tools
Tools
Feeley, Anne-Marie and Biggerstaff, Deborah (2015) Exam success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools : is learning style or learning approach more important? : A critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry (“traditional”) and graduate-entry (“nontraditional”) medical students. Teaching and learning in medicine, Volume 27 (Number 3). pp. 237-244. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734
|
PDF
WRAP_HTLM 2014 0167 R1.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (699Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734
Abstract
Phenomenon:
The literature on learning styles over many years has been replete with debate and disagreement. Researchers have yet to elucidate exactly which underlying constructs are measured by the many learning styles questionnaires available. Some academics question whether learning styles exist at all. When it comes to establishing the value of learning styles for medical students, a further issue emerges. The demographics of medical students in the United Kingdom have changed in recent years, so past studies may not be applicable to students today. We wanted to answer a very simple, practical question: what can the literature on learning styles tell us that we can use to help today's medical students succeed academically at medical school?
Approach:
We conducted a literature review to synthesise the available evidence on how two different aspects of learning—the way in which students like to receive information in a learning environment (termed learning “styles”) and the motivations that drive their learning (termed learning “approaches”)—can impact on medical students' academic achievement.
Findings:
Our review confirms that although learning “styles” do not correlate with exam performance, learning “approaches” do: those with “strategic” and “deep” approaches to learning (i.e., motivated to do well and motivated to learn deeply respectively) perform consistently better in medical school examinations. Changes in medical school entrant demographics in the past decade have not altered these correlations. Optimistically, our review reveals that students' learning approaches can change and more adaptive approaches may be learned.
Insights:
For educators wishing to help medical students succeed academically, current evidence demonstrates that helping students develop their own positive learning approach using “growth mind-set” is a more effective (and more feasible) than attempting to alter students' learning styles. This conclusion holds true for both “traditional” and graduate-entry medical students.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) | ||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > ( - July 2016) Medical Education Hub Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Mental Health and Wellbeing Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Medicine -- Study and teaching, Medical students -- Training of, Medical education | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Teaching and learning in medicine | ||||||
| Publisher: | Routledge | ||||||
| ISSN: | 1040-1334 | ||||||
| Official Date: | 9 July 2015 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 30 December 2015 | ||||||
| Volume: | Volume 27 | ||||||
| Number: | Number 3 | ||||||
| Number of Pages: | 8 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 237-244 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
