• Other

Aron, A., Schlaghecken, F., Fletcher, P., Bullmore, E., Eimer, M., Barker,
R., et al. (2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is
mediated by the caudate and thalamus: Evidence from fMRI and
Huntington’s disease. Brain, 126, 713–723.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M.,
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1999). Imaging unconscious semantic
priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.
Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime
stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta
Psychologica, 101, 293–313.
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor
activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24,
1737–1747.
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness
and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 9, 514–520.
Eimer, M., Schubo¨ , A., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). The locus of inhibition
in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor
Behaviour, 34, 3–10.
Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are
localized to response-generation processes. Psychology and Aging,
16, 47–54.
Hartley, A. A., & Kieley, J. M. (1995). Adult age differences in the
inhibition of return of visual attention. Psychology and Aging, 10,
670–683.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and
aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology
of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). New York:
Academic Press.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian
arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and
P160 SCHLAGHECKEN AND MAYLOR
Downloaded from psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org at University of Warwick on July 22, 2011
performance XVII. Cognitive regulation and performance: Interaction
of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect:
Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255–269.
Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer,
D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory
processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491–512.
Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked
stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological
Science, 9, 263–269.
Maylor, E. A., & Henson, R. N. A. (2000). Aging and the Ranschburg
effect: No evidence of reduced response suppression in old age.
Psychology and Aging, 15, 657–670.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., de Jong, R., Kok, A., & van der
Molen, M. W. (2000). Inhibitory inefficiency and failures of intention
activation: Age-related decline in the control of saccadic eye movements.
Psychology and Aging, 15, 635–647.
Raz, N. (2000). Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance:
Integration of structural and functional findings. In F. I. M. Craik &
T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed.,
pp. 1–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central/peripheral asymmetry in
subliminal priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367–1382.
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without
inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control.
Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148–162.
Schlaghecken, F., Mu¨nchau, A., Bloem, B., Rothwell, J. C., & Eimer,
M. (2003). Slow frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
affects reaction times, but not priming effects, in a masked prime task.
Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1272–1277.
Seiss, E., & Praamstra, P. (2004). The basal ganglia and inhibitory
mechanisms in response selection: Evidence from subliminal priming of
motor responses in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 127, 330–339.