The Library
Digital communication between clinician and patient in General Practice and the impact on marginalised groups : a realist review
Tools
Tools
Tools
Huxley, Caroline J., Atherton, Helen, Watkins, Jocelyn and Griffiths, Frances (2015) Digital communication between clinician and patient in General Practice and the impact on marginalised groups : a realist review. British Journal of General Practice . doi:10.3399/bjgp15X687853 ISSN 0960-1643.
|
PDF
WRAP_Huxley 2015 full.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (425Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X687853
Abstract
Background Increasingly, the NHS is embracing the use of digital communication technology for communication between clinicians and patients. Policymakers deem digital clinical communication as presenting a solution to the capacity issues currently faced by general practice. There is some concern that these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities in accessing health care. It is not known what impact they may have on groups who are already marginalised in their ability to access general practice.
Aim To assess the potential impact of the availability of digital clinician–patient communication on marginalised groups’ access to general practice in the UK.
Design and setting Realist review in general practice.
Method A four-step realist review process was used: to define the scope of the review; to search for and scrutinise evidence; to extract and synthesise evidence; and to develop a narrative, including hypotheses.
Results Digital communication has the potential to overcome the following barriers for marginalised groups: practical access issues, previous negative experiences with healthcare service/staff, and stigmatising reactions from staff and other patients. It may reduce patient-related barriers by offering anonymity and offers advantages to patients who require an interpreter. It does not impact on inability to communicate with healthcare professionals or on a lack of candidacy. It is likely to work best in the context of a pre-existing clinician–patient relationship.
Conclusion Digital communication technology offers increased opportunities for marginalised groups to access health care. However, it cannot remove all barriers to care for these groups. It is likely that they will remain disadvantaged relative to other population groups after their introduction.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH) Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Physician and patient, Communication in medicine, Medicine--Communication systems, Health services accessibility, Medical informatics, Telecommunication in medicine | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | British Journal of General Practice | ||||
| Publisher: | Royal College of General Practitioners | ||||
| ISSN: | 0960-1643 | ||||
| Official Date: | 15 December 2015 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| DOI: | 10.3399/bjgp15X687853 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||
| Funder: | Arden Cluster Research Capability Fund, National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain). Service Delivery and Organisation Programme (NIHR SDO), National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain). School for Primary Care Research |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
