Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Foraging in semantic fields : how we search through memory

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hills, Thomas Trenholm, Todd, Peter M. and Jones, Michael N. (2015) Foraging in semantic fields : how we search through memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7 (3). pp. 513-534. doi:10.1111/tops.12151

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_hillstoddjonestopics_final.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (794Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12151

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

When searching for concepts in memory-as in the verbal fluency task of naming all the animals one can think of-people appear to explore internal mental representations in much the same way that animals forage in physical space: searching locally within patches of information before transitioning globally between patches. However, the definition of the patches being searched in mental space is not well specified. Do we search by activating explicit predefined categories (e.g., pets) and recall items from within that category (categorical search), or do we activate and recall a connected sequence of individual items without using categorical information, with each item recalled leading to the retrieval of an associated item in a stream (associative search), or both? Using semantic representations in a search of associative memory framework and data from the animal fluency task, we tested competing hypotheses based on associative and categorical search models. Associative, but not categorical, patch transitions took longer to make than position-matched productions, suggesting that categorical transitions were not true transitions. There was also clear evidence of associative search even within categorical patch boundaries. Furthermore, most individuals' behavior was best explained by an associative search model without the addition of categorical information. Thus, our results support a search process that does not use categorical information, but for which patch boundaries shift with each recall and local search is well described by a random walk in semantic space, with switches to new regions of the semantic space when the current region is depleted.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Verbal behavior -- Testing, Semantics -- Research, Recollection (Psychology)
Journal or Publication Title: Topics in Cognitive Science
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN: 1756-8757
Official Date: July 2015
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2015Published
22 June 2015Available
3 April 2015Accepted
7 August 2014Submitted
Volume: 7
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 513-534
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12151
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us