Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Constitutional litigation as dispute processing : comparing the U.S. supreme court and the German federal constitutional court

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Rogowski, Ralf and Gawron, Thomas (2002) Constitutional litigation as dispute processing : comparing the U.S. supreme court and the German federal constitutional court. In: Rogowski, Ralf and Gawron, Thomas, (eds.) Constitutional courts in comparison : the U.S. Supreme Court and the German federal constitutional court. New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 9781571812896

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/46422265

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The paper compares the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) by using a socio-legal perspective. In this view, the US Supreme Court is a constitutional court functionally comparable to the German constitutional court because more than half of its decisions focus on constitutional law issues. Like its German counterpart it engages in judicial review of legislation and is the institution to which citizens turn to claim their constitutional rights, and in particular those with little or no financial means to engage in litigation. The paper borrows insights from socio-legal studies for the comparison and proposes in particular to view constitutional litigation as dispute processing. It distinguishes three phases of dispute processing: mobilization of disputes, decision making in court, and implementation of judicial decisions. The paper investigates docket control exercised at the two courts, internal ways of case disposal with a particular focus on the interplay of judges and legal assistants, as well as conditions of implementation of decisions. Finally, it analyses functional aspects that include composition and impact of the courts on democracy and political culture.

Item Type: Book Item
Subjects: K Law [Moys] > KG Common Law, America
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Government litigation, Constitutional courts -- Germany, Constitutional courts -- United States
Publisher: Berghahn Books
Place of Publication: New York
ISBN: 9781571812896
Book Title: Constitutional courts in comparison : the U.S. Supreme Court and the German federal constitutional court
Editor: Rogowski, Ralf and Gawron, Thomas
Official Date: 2002
Dates:
DateEvent
2002Published
Number of Pages: 29
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • Publisher
  • Related item in WRAP

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us