The Library

Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in Primary School: a controlled trial

Tools

Sapouna, Maria, Wolke, Dieter, Vannini, Natalie, Watson, Scott, Woods, Sarah, Schneider, Wolfgang, Enz, Sibylle, Hall, Lynne, Paiva, Ana, André, Elisabeth, Prof. Dr., Dautenhahn, Kerstin and Aylett, Ruth, 1951- (2010) Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in Primary School: a controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, Vol.51 (No.1). pp. 104-112. ISSN 0021-9630

Preview

PDF
WRAP_WOLke_virtual_learning_intervention.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (236Kb)

Official URL: http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=0021-9630&s...

Abstract

Background: Anti-bullying interventions to date have shown limited success in reducing victimization and have rarely been evaluated using a controlled trial design. This study examined the effects of the FearNot anti-bullying virtual learning intervention on escaping, and reducing overall victimization rates among primary school students using a nonrandomized controlled trial design. The program was designed to enhance the coping skills of children who are known to be, or are likely to be, victimized. Methods: One thousand one hundred twenty-nine children (mean age, 8.9 years) in twentyseven primary schools across the UK and Germany were assigned to the FearNot intervention or the waiting control condition. The program consisted of three sessions each lasting approximately 30 minutes over a three-week period. The participants were assessed on selfreport measures of victimization before and one and four weeks after the intervention or the normal curriculum period. Results: In the combined sample, baseline victims in the intervention group were more likely to escape victimization at the first follow-up compared with baseline victims in the control group (adjusted RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.81). A dose-response relationship between the amount of active interaction with the virtual victims and escaping victimization was found (adjusted OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.003-1.18). Subsample analyses found a significant effect on escaping victimization only to hold for UK children (adjusted RR, 1.90; CI, 1.23-2.57). UK children in the intervention group experienced decreased victimization rates at the first follow-up compared with controls, even after adjusting for baseline victimization, gender and age (adjusted RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.93). Conclusions: A virtual learning intervention designed to help children experience effective strategies for dealing with bullying had a short-term effect on escaping victimization for a priori identified victims, and a short-term overall prevention effect for UK children. Keywords: anti-bullying intervention, victimization, virtual learning, controlled trial Abbreviation: FearNot: Fun with Empathic Agents to achieve Novel Outcomes in Teaching Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry, NCT00597337

Item Type:	Submitted Journal Article
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Bullying in schools -- Great Britain -- Prevention, Bullying in schools -- Germany -- Prevention, Virtual reality in education, Virtual reality therapy, Education, Primary -- Audio-visual aids
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0021-9630
Date:	January 2010
Volume:	Vol.51
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	pp. 104-112
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02137.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6)
Grant number:	IST-4-027656-STP (FP6)
References:	Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118(1), 130-138. Aylett, R.S., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., Vala, M., Woods, S., & Hall, L. (2006). Unscripted narrative for affectively driven characters. IEEE Journal of Graphics and Animation, 26 (3), 42-52. Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Effectiveness of programs to prevent school bullying. Violence and Victims, 2(2), 183 - 204. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Bond, L., Carlin, J. B., Thomas, L., Rubin, K., & Patton, G. (2001). Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. BMJ, 323(7311), 480-484. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., DuBay, T., Daytner, G., & Karageorge, K. (2000). Preliminary evaluation of a multimedia violence prevention program for adolescents. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(4), 268-280. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling with HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago, ILL.: Scientific Software International. Champion, K., Vernberg, E., & Shipman, K. (2003). Nonbullying victims of bullies: Aggression, social skills, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 535-551. Cowie, H. (2000). Bystanding or standing by: Gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools. Aggressive Behavior, 26(1), 85-97. Dupont, W., & Plummer, W. (1997). PS: power and sample size program available for free on the Internet. Controlled Clinical Trials, 18, 274. Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., Fredriks, A. M., Vogels, T., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2006). Do bullied children get Ill, or do Ill children get bullied? A prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics, 117(5), 1568-1574. Hall, L., Woods, S., Hall, M., & Wolke, D. (2007). Children's emotional interpretation of synthetic character interactions. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (Vol. 4738/2007, pp. 642-653). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer. Hobbs, J. L., & Yan, Z. (2008). Cracking the walnut: Using a computer game to impact cognition, emotion, and behavior of highly aggressive fifth grade students. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 421-438. Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (2000). Victimized children's responses to peers' aggression: Behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 9(01), 59-73. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Krijn M., Emmelkamp P.M., Olafsson R.P., & Biemond, R. (2004). Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(3), 259-281. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. Mahady Wilton, M. M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9(2), 226-245. O'Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 437-452. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453-459. Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22(2), 99-109. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332-339. Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 547-560. Smith, P. K., Ananiadou, K., & Cowie, H. (2003). Interventions to reduce school bullying. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(9), 591-599. Vreeman, R. C., & Carroll, A. E. (2007). A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161(1), 78-88. Watson, S. E. J., Vannini, N., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Sapouna, M., Enz, S., et al. Inter-cultural differences in response to a computer based anti-bullying intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication. Williams, K., Chambers, M., Logan, S., & Robinson, D. (1996). Association of common health symptoms with bullying in primary school children. BMJ, 313(7048), 17-19. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92(4), 673-696. Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2003). Does the content of anti-bullying policies inform us about the prevalence of direct and relational bullying behaviour in primary schools? Educational Psychology, 23(4), 381-401. Zhang, J., & Yu, K. F. (1998). What's the relative risk?: A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes, JAMA, 280 (19), 1690-1691.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/718