Tadros, Victor (2002) The system of the criminal law. Legal Studies, 22 (3). pp. 448-467. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00201.x

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyse the extent to which elements of the criminal law admit uniform definition across offences, and the implications of that question. That debate contributes to recent scholarship on the scope, purpose and content of the general part. I argue that there are elements which can be defined uniformly, elements which cannot be defined uniformly and elements which, although they are subject to variation depending on offence context, ought to be considered in general by the courts. The considerations that are important in thinking about uniformity are outlined in each of these cases. This has implications for the way in which we think about the general part. Generality is a question of both degree and kind. Consequently, the scope, purpose and content of the general part are more complex than has previously been thought. In the final section I sketch some of the implications that this analysis of the general part might have for methodology generally and, in particular, for social theory.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title:	Legal Studies
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0261-3875
Official Date:	September 2002
Dates:	Date Event September 2002 Published
Volume:	22
Number:	3
Page Range:	pp. 448-467
DOI:	10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00201.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item