Spencer, Nick, 1943-. (2005) Does material disadvantage explain the increased risk of adverse health, educational, and behavioural outcomes among children in lone parent households in Britain? : a cross sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Vol.59 (No.2). pp. 152-157. ISSN 0143-005X

Preview

PDF WRAP_Spencer_Material_disadvantage.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (113Kb)

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that material disadvantage explains the increased risk among children and young people of adverse health, educational, and behavioural problems associated with living in lone parent households in Britain Study design: Secondary analysis of a cross sectional survey of a representative sample of British households with children and youth Main outcomes: Parent reported fair/poor health, longstanding illness and disability, statement of special educational needs, suspension and/or expulsion from school, and in trouble with the police. Participants: Data were available on 15 636 (8049 boys and 7587 girls) aged 0-18 years in 8541 households in the third sweep (2001) of the British government's families and children study Results: Lone parenthood was associated with increased risk of health and educational problems, and antisocial behaviour among boys and girls in a logistic regression model adjusting for child's age alone. Adding age of main carer, number of dependent children, and child's rank in the household made little difference to the associations. Addition of housing tenure, household hardship index, and an interaction term for lone parenthood and hardship eliminated the relation with lone parenthood for all outcomes except parent reported health among girls. Similar results were obtained for households headed by lone parents for at least a year. An interaction effect of lone parenthood with hardship for parent reported health and statement of special educational needs was noted. Conclusion: Adverse effects of lone parenthood on health, education, and antisocial behaviour were apparently explained by material disadvantage in this cross sectional sample of British households with children and youth.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Children of single parents -- Great Britain, Low-income parents -- Great Britain, Children -- Health and hygiene -- Great Britain, Behavior disorders in children -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Publisher:	BMJ Group
ISSN:	0143-005X
Date:	February 2005
Volume:	Vol.59
Number:	No.2
Number of Pages:	6
Page Range:	pp. 152-157
Identification Number:	10.1136/jech.2004.020248
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	1 Haskey J. One-parent families and their dependent children in Great Britain. In: Ford R, Millar J, eds. Private lives and public responses. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1998:22–41. 2 Marsh A, Perry J. Family change 1999–2001, research report 180. London: Department for Work and Pensions, 2003. 3 Ford R, Millar J, eds. Private lives and public responses. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1998. 4 McMunn AM, Nazroo JY, Marmot MG, et al. Children’s emotional and behavioural well-being and the family environment: findings from the health survey for England. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:423–40. 5 Garnefski N, Diekstra RFW. Adolescents from one parent, stepparent and intact families: emotional problems and suicide attempts. J Adolesc 1997;20:201–8. 6 Luoma I, Puura K, Tamminen T, et al. Emotional and behavioural symptoms in 8–9 year old children in relation to family structure. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 1999;8(suppl 4):IV29–40. 7 Clark JJ, Sawyer MG, Nguyen AM, et al. Emotional and behavioural problems experienced by children living in single-parent families: a pilot study. J Paediatr Child Health 1993;29:338–43. 8 Spruijt E, DeGoede M, Vandervalk I. The well-being of youngters coming from six different family types. Patient Educat Counselling 2001;45:285–94. 9 Franz M, Lensche H, Schmitz N. Psychological distress and socioeconomic status in single mothers and their children in a German city. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003;38:59–68. 10 Underwood P, Kamien M. Health care needs of the children of single mothers in a Perth suburb. Aust Paediatr J 1984;20:203–4. 11 Le Blanc M, McDuff P, Tremblay RE. Types of families, living conditions, functioning family systems and social maladjustment during latency and adolescence in underprivileged milieus (French). Sante Ment Que 1991;16:45–75. 12 Buchanan A, Ten Brinke J, Flouri E. Parental background, social disadvantage, public ‘‘care’’, and psychological problems in adolescence and adulthood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:1415–23. 13 Lipman EL, Boyle MH, Dooley MD, et al. Child well-being in single-mother families. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41:75–82. 14 Dunn J, Deater-Deckard K, Pickering K, et al. Children’s adjustment and prosocial behaviour in step-, single- parent and non-stepfamily settings: findings from a community study. ALSPAC study team. Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39:1083–95. 15 Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, et al. Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. London: The Stationery Office, 2000. 16 Joshi H, Cooksey EC, Wiggins RD, et al. Diverse family living situations and child development: a multi-level analysis comparing longitudinal evidence from Britain and the United States. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family 1999;13:292–314. 17 Wadsworth J, Burnell I, Taylor B, et al. The influence of family type on children’s behaviour and development at five years. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 1985;26:245–54. 18 Ringba¨ck Weitoft G, Hjern A, Haglund B, et al. Mortality, severe morbidity, and injury in children living with single parents in Sweden: a populationbased study. Lancet 2003;361:289–95. 19 Wadsworth J, Burnell I, Taylor B, et al. Family type and accidents in preschool children. J Epidemiol Community Health 1983;37:100–4. 20 Fleming DM, Charlton JRH. Morbidity and healthcare utilisation of children in households with one adult: comparative observational study. BMJ 1998;16:1572–6. 21 Whitehead M, Burstro¨m B, Diderichsen F. Social policies and the pathways to inequalities in health: comparative analysis of lone mothers in Britain and Sweden. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:255–70. 22 Hope S, Power C, Rodgers B. Does financial hardship account for elevated psychological distress in lone mothers? Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1637–49. 23 Benzeval M. The self-reported health status of lone parents. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1337–53. 24 Wiggins DW, Wale C. Modeling intergenerational transmission in longitudinal cohorts using multilevel methods. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique 1996;51:27–41. 25 Cooksey EC. Consequences of young mothers’ marital histories for children’s cognitive development. J Marriage Fam 1997;58:693–707. 26 Smith JR, Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov PK. Consequences of living in poverty for young children’s cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement. In: Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, eds. Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1997. 27 Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Confounding in epidemiological studies: why ‘‘independent effects’’ may not be all they seem. BMJ 1992;305:757–9. 28 Vegeris S, Perry J. Families and children 2001: living standards and the children. Research report 190. London: Corporate Document Services on behalf of Department for Work and Pensions, 2003. 29 Whitehead M, Holland P. What puts children of lone parents at a health disadvantage? Lancet 2003;361:271.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/7201

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item