Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

W(h)ither the idea of publicness? Besieged democratic legitimacy under the extraconstitutional hybrid regulation across the Taiwan strait

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kuo, Ming-Sung (2011) W(h)ither the idea of publicness? Besieged democratic legitimacy under the extraconstitutional hybrid regulation across the Taiwan strait. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, 7 . pp. 221-255.

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Hybrid regulatory bodies have been credited for functioning as an
institutional bypass around the bureaucratic procedures and
providing expedient responses to the changing needs of
administrative governance. As hybrid regulatory bodies are utilized
in transnational regulation, however, concerns have arisen over the
lack of transparency and the evasion of accountability in the face of
their informality and flexibility. This article aims to explore the
issues surrounding the democratic legitimacy of transnational
hybrid administration through a case study of the Cross-Straits
Economic Cooperation Committee (CSECC) provided in the
Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement between the Straits
Exchange Foundation and the Association for Relations Across the
Taiwan Straits, two private legal bodies on behalf of Taiwan and
China, respectively. I argue that the CSECC is deliberately
designed to avoid the institutional features associated with the idea
of publicness.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title: University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review
Official Date: 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
2011Published
Volume: 7
Page Range: pp. 221-255
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Related URLs:
  • Open Access File

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us