Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Justice on the slaughter-bench : the problem of war guilt in Arendt and Jaspers

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Norrie, Alan W. (2009) Justice on the slaughter-bench : the problem of war guilt in Arendt and Jaspers. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick, School of Law. (Warwick School of Law Research Paper Series).

An open access version can be found in:
  • SSRN

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article develops a meta-ethical inquiry into the nature and possibility of international justice. It sees the understanding of such justice as caught between two poles. On one hand, there is a naively optimistic vision of its possibility in a world of nation-states and power politics; on the other, an overly reductive and pessimistic account of justice as only that of the victor. The ethical truth lies between these two positions, in an aporetic middle ground. The article addresses its concerns by constructing a debate between Hannah Arendt and Karl Jaspers out of their different positions in Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and Jaspers’s The Question of German War Guilt. It begins by identifying a conflict in Arendt’s account of war guilt in the Eichmann trial, between her support for the possibility of international criminal justice and her view that an ethical community of judgment cannot be constituted for the defendant and others like him. It then seeks a way of addressing this conflict through a critical reading of Jaspers’s account of metaphysical guilt in the context of his ambivalence towards collective guilt. Thinking of the ethics of justice in Jaspers’s metaphysical terms does not, however, lead to an easy solution to Arendt’s problem of the justification of an international criminal justice. What emerges rather is an uneasy relationship between the legal and the ethical, where the latter both draws on and disturbs legal categories.

Item Type: Report
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Series Name: Warwick School of Law Research Paper Series
Publisher: University of Warwick, School of Law
Place of Publication: Coventry, UK
Official Date: 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
2009Available
Number of Pages: 45
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Open Access Version:
  • SSRN

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us